Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1995
DOI: 10.1126/science.270.5238.935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Design: A Hierarchic Approach

Abstract: The de novo design of peptides and proteins has recently emerged as an approach for investigating protein structure and function. Designed, helical peptides provide model systems for dissecting and quantifying the multiple interactions that stabilize secondary structure formation. De novo design is also useful for exploring the features that specify the stoichiometry and stability of alpha-helical coiled coils and for defining the requirements for folding into structures that resemble native, functional protei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
472
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 564 publications
(488 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
9
472
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to compare the information measures with results obtained investigating residue a-helix propensities (Bryson et al, 1995), both previous statistical work (e.g., Gibrat et al, 1987;Williams et al, 1987), and the larger literature based on direct experimentation, e.g., using directed mutagenesis (Horovitz et al, 1992;Blaber et al, 1993) and model peptides (Padmanabhan et al, 1990). The correlation of the DSC intraresidue information for the 20 residues with a-helix propensities of the other methods is: Gibrat et al (1987) surveys has the advantage over physical-based methods in being based on many more proteins, and thus averaged over all types of protein environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to compare the information measures with results obtained investigating residue a-helix propensities (Bryson et al, 1995), both previous statistical work (e.g., Gibrat et al, 1987;Williams et al, 1987), and the larger literature based on direct experimentation, e.g., using directed mutagenesis (Horovitz et al, 1992;Blaber et al, 1993) and model peptides (Padmanabhan et al, 1990). The correlation of the DSC intraresidue information for the 20 residues with a-helix propensities of the other methods is: Gibrat et al (1987) surveys has the advantage over physical-based methods in being based on many more proteins, and thus averaged over all types of protein environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, synthetic schemes have been successfully developed for the synthesis of R-helix-forming peptides, and much has been uncovered about their folding dynamics (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). In contrast, only limited progress has been made toward understanding the synthesis of and the dynamics of -sheet peptides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] This approach aims to minimize structural complexity with a view to maximize visualization of a designed function that is so often obscured in natural proteins. We are using these simplified synthetic protein maquettes 9 to identify the requirements for protein assembly and incorporation of electron-transfer cofactors and to determine what controls in situ electrochemistry, kinetic activity, and the nature of coupled chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%