Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560051116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable protein secondary structure prediction

Abstract: A protein secondary structure prediction method from multiply aligned homologous sequences is presented with an overall per residue three-state accuracy of 70.1 %. There are two aims: to obtain high accuracy by identification of a set of concepts important for prediction followed by use of linear statistics; and to provide insight into the folding process. The important concepts in secondary structure prediction are identified as: residue conformational propensities, sequence edge effects, moments of hydrophob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
264
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 433 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
264
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight algorithms were initially evaluated for predicting the a-helix and b-sheet content of segments of the A-domains of the staphylococcal MSCRAMMs CNA, ClfA and SdrG for which crystal structure data have been reported (Deivanayagam et al, 1999;Ponnuraj et al, 2003;Symersky et al, 1997). The results showed high variation with the algorithms PHD, DSC and SOPM (Geourjon & Deleage, 1994;King & Sternberg, 1996;Rost & Sander, 1993) being most accurate when aligned with corresponding crystallography data. The mean deviation from solved structures for Cna, SdrG and ClfA was 0?4, 2?2 and 2?8 % for a-helices, and 1?9, 0?6 and 3?3 % for b-sheet, respectively.…”
Section: Expression Purification and Characterization Of Putative A-mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Eight algorithms were initially evaluated for predicting the a-helix and b-sheet content of segments of the A-domains of the staphylococcal MSCRAMMs CNA, ClfA and SdrG for which crystal structure data have been reported (Deivanayagam et al, 1999;Ponnuraj et al, 2003;Symersky et al, 1997). The results showed high variation with the algorithms PHD, DSC and SOPM (Geourjon & Deleage, 1994;King & Sternberg, 1996;Rost & Sander, 1993) being most accurate when aligned with corresponding crystallography data. The mean deviation from solved structures for Cna, SdrG and ClfA was 0?4, 2?2 and 2?8 % for a-helices, and 1?9, 0?6 and 3?3 % for b-sheet, respectively.…”
Section: Expression Purification and Characterization Of Putative A-mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Another approach trains a second-stage neural network to map the raw predictions across neighboring residues to the final prediction for the current position 25,39 . A third approach uses a set of explicit rules to decide the final prediction based on the raw predictions 40 , which requires the proper integration of domain knowledge.…”
Section: Pondr Vl3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The server also incorporates secondary structure prediction using the PSIPRED method [21]. In addition, we also used the Network Protein Sequence Analysis secondary structure prediction server (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr) implementing the MLRC [22], DSC [23], and PHD predictive methods [24]. For identification of the putative fold we utilised the intensive search mode of the Phyre2 online server [25].…”
Section: Structure Prediction From Sequence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%