SAE Technical Paper Series 1928
DOI: 10.4271/280024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective Value of Chromium-Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The random directions and spacings of Type M cracks in chromium indicate that these occur when isotropic internal stresses exceed the tensile strength of the deposit. Although cracking similar to Type Y has been observed previously in chromium deposits up to 0.050 mil thick (1,2,11,(24)(25)(26), it appears thai no serious attempt has ever been made to explain their origin other than by vague attributions to "stress." In the absence of externally applied stresses, anisotropic stress distribution in the deposit appears to be the most likely explanation of the directionality of Type Y cracking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The random directions and spacings of Type M cracks in chromium indicate that these occur when isotropic internal stresses exceed the tensile strength of the deposit. Although cracking similar to Type Y has been observed previously in chromium deposits up to 0.050 mil thick (1,2,11,(24)(25)(26), it appears thai no serious attempt has ever been made to explain their origin other than by vague attributions to "stress." In the absence of externally applied stresses, anisotropic stress distribution in the deposit appears to be the most likely explanation of the directionality of Type Y cracking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Baker and Pinner [237] used this test to study the porosity and cracking of decorative chromium coatings. An important precaution is to apply it only to articles completely covered with chromium or to insulate all areas not chromium plated.…”
Section: Porosity and Crackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until about 1960 decorative chromium deposits were generally confined to thicknesses of 0.5 mm or less since macrocracking would begin at this thickness. Under normal service conditions, macrocracks in thick deposits would contribute to a reduction in corrosion resistance [237]. Since the development of bright macrocrack-free chromium plating [242,243], it has been demonstrated that if the undercoating of nickel or copper and nickel is of adequate thickness (generally more than 25 mm), a thicker decorative chromium plate adds substantially to the corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Corrosion Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%