1960
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-104-25830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection, by Coronary Ligature, Against Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial Necroses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1971
1971
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that a number of treatments may protect the heart against isoproterenolinduced tissue injury, including prior exposure to lowdose isoproterenol (9) and prior ischemia-reperfusion (30). In the present study, we found that sepsis did not protect against isoproterenol-induced tissue injury.…”
Section: Isoproterenol and The Myocardium In Sepsiscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Previous studies have shown that a number of treatments may protect the heart against isoproterenolinduced tissue injury, including prior exposure to lowdose isoproterenol (9) and prior ischemia-reperfusion (30). In the present study, we found that sepsis did not protect against isoproterenol-induced tissue injury.…”
Section: Isoproterenol and The Myocardium In Sepsiscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In 1960, Selye et al (18) first showed that a preparatory procedure, coronary artery ligation, while itself causing myocardial necrosis, appeared to protect the rest of the myocardium against a subsequent challenging insult {toxic doses of ISO 1 week later). In 1960, Selye et al (18) first showed that a preparatory procedure, coronary artery ligation, while itself causing myocardial necrosis, appeared to protect the rest of the myocardium against a subsequent challenging insult {toxic doses of ISO 1 week later).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Released catecholamines may have produced myocardial lesions (Rosenblum, Wohl & Stein, 1965) and enhanced the arrhythmogenicity of isoprenaline. Although this possibility cannot be excluded a priori, available evidence suggests that the presence of myocardial damage induced by either coronary artery ligation (Selye, Veilleux & Grasso, 1960;Dusek, Rona & Kahn, 1970) or catecholamine administration (Balazs, Ohtake & Noble, 1972) does not increase the cardiotoxic nor the arrhythmogenic action of isoprenaline (Joseph, Bloom, Pledger & Balazs, 1983;Joseph, Jordan & Balazs, 1984).…”
Section: ?Iscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%