2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting the Heart: A Practical Approach to Account for the Full Extent of Heart Motion in Radiation Therapy Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies measured the magnitude of the cardio-respiratory motion of the heart and its substructures among free-breathing patients [12,13]. However, deep inhalation breath-hold (DIBH) represents one of the most well studied cardiac sparing techniques [14], and its application leads to the necessity of accurate information about the substructure motion and dose variation due to cardiac activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies measured the magnitude of the cardio-respiratory motion of the heart and its substructures among free-breathing patients [12,13]. However, deep inhalation breath-hold (DIBH) represents one of the most well studied cardiac sparing techniques [14], and its application leads to the necessity of accurate information about the substructure motion and dose variation due to cardiac activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitations of this study are the cohort size and restriction to lung cancer cases. The 4D-AVE was used rather than the MIP despite prior work demonstrating the whole heart on 4D-AVE requires larger PRV margins than on MIP [47] . However, 4D-AVE was chosen for its superior soft tissue definition suited to delineating the complex geometries of the cardiac substructures, and for its similarity to the 3D-CT scan, on which our deep learning tool was based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reliance on the FBCT means that motion is ignored in the model, and this is generally a limitation of any cardiac or intracardiac contouring process unless cardiac gating is used at the time of CT simulation. Methods to account for local motion of the heart in radiation treatment planning have recently been proposed, 41 but information is lacking on motion of specific cardiac substructures. This is an area that needs further study to better inform models such as the proposed which may be used to prospectively generate radiation treatment plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%