Protease-Activated Receptor 1 (PAR1) Expression Contributes to HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Prognosis

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer occasionally has a poor prognosis, making prognostic risk strati cation crucial. Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) is involved in carcinogenesis and is regulated by alpha-arrestin domain-containing protein 3 (ARRDC3). It is also involved in the tumor microenvironment. We sought to evaluate the predictive ability of PAR1, ARRDC3, and tumorin ltrating lymphocyte (TIL) scores in patients with oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and uterine cervical cancers, serving as comparators for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.Methods: Immunohistochemical analysis of p16, ARRDC3, and PAR1 expression was performed for 79 oropharyngeal, 44 hypopharyngeal, and 42 uterine cervical cancer samples. The TIL scores were assessed and classi ed into the following groups based on invasion: Low: 0 %-10 %, Medium: 20 %-40 %, and high: >50 %. For prognostic analysis, the three groups were evaluated by dividing them into low, medium, and high categories, or alternatively into two groups using the median value as the cutoff.Results: p16 was expressed in 44 (56 %) oropharyngeal, 8 (18 %) hypopharyngeal, and all uterine cervical cancer samples. ARRDC3 was detected in 39 (49 %) oropharyngeal, 25 (57 %) hypopharyngeal, and 23 (55 %) uterine cervical cancer samples. PAR1 was expressed in 45 (57 %) oropharyngeal, 22 (50 %) hypopharyngeal, and 22 (50 %) uterine cervical cancer samples. Patients diagnosed with p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer had a substantially improved prognosis compared to those diagnosed as p16negative cases. Compared to the p16-positive cases, the PAR1-negative cases had a considerably improved prognosis compared to the positive cases (disease-speci c survival [DSS] and -negative cases (disease-free survival [DFS]). Multivariate analysis revealed that ARRDC3-positive cases had an appreciably better DSS prognosis than patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal cancers.PAR1-positive cases among patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer had a poor prognosis. With respect to DFS, patients with PAR1positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal cancer had a 35-fold higher recurrence rate than those with PAR1negative and p16-negative oropharyngeal cancer. Conclusion:Our results suggest that PAR1 expression affects the prognosis and recurrence rate of HPVassociated oropharyngeal cancer.