2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2015.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthodontic Considerations in Post-cancer Reconstructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of anatomic differences between curvilinear mandible and straight fibula, a biology-driven paradigm is preferred to a prosthesisdriven paradigm. 20 Established procedures were used for surgical planning and treatments, [15][16][17][18][19] distraction distance, 19 and implant placement, 17 with number of implants guided by Heydecke et al 21 FMR implant uncovering occurred at least 6 months after reconstruction. Implant prosthesis was completed after a minimum of 1 month (Fig.…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of anatomic differences between curvilinear mandible and straight fibula, a biology-driven paradigm is preferred to a prosthesisdriven paradigm. 20 Established procedures were used for surgical planning and treatments, [15][16][17][18][19] distraction distance, 19 and implant placement, 17 with number of implants guided by Heydecke et al 21 FMR implant uncovering occurred at least 6 months after reconstruction. Implant prosthesis was completed after a minimum of 1 month (Fig.…”
Section: Surgical Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odpowiednio zaplanowane położenie implantów, odpowiadające koncepcji zaopatrzenia protetycznego, ułatwia wykonanie funkcjonalnej i estetycznej nadbudowy protetycznej, co przyspiesza adaptację do uzupełnienia protetycznego, poprawia efekt estetyczny rehabilitacji protetycznej i zdecydowanie podnosi jakość życia pacjenta. 13,14 Piśmiennictwo…”
Section: Ryc 10 Zdjęcie Wewnątrzustne -Stan Po Zakończonej Rehabiliunclassified