1995
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00137-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate-specific antigen for pretreatment prediction and posttreatment evaluation of outcome after definitive irradiation for prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…20 This grade effect has also been demonstrated in patients with otherwise favorable prognostic factors of early clinical stage (T1-T2) and initial PSA level less than 15 ng/mL, using freedom from PSA progression as an end point. 22 Since PSA testing became widespread beginning in the early 1990s, it has become apparent that the PSA level at diagnosis is a more significant independent prognostic variable than grade [22][23][24] and that the posttreatment PSA levels represent the standard for measurement of treatment effectiveness and patient cure. 25 Differences range between 10% and 40% for outcomes, based on reports of clinical control vs PSA findings.…”
Section: Treatment Planning/deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 This grade effect has also been demonstrated in patients with otherwise favorable prognostic factors of early clinical stage (T1-T2) and initial PSA level less than 15 ng/mL, using freedom from PSA progression as an end point. 22 Since PSA testing became widespread beginning in the early 1990s, it has become apparent that the PSA level at diagnosis is a more significant independent prognostic variable than grade [22][23][24] and that the posttreatment PSA levels represent the standard for measurement of treatment effectiveness and patient cure. 25 Differences range between 10% and 40% for outcomes, based on reports of clinical control vs PSA findings.…”
Section: Treatment Planning/deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current results of treatment with conventional doses of radiation (<70 Gy) show similar rates of bNED control when patients are stratified by pretreatment PSA levels [35,40,[45][46][47][48]. However, as pretreatment PSA levels increase, rates of bNED control decrease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Notamos que a maioria é de risco intermediário (44%), enquanto 33% são de risco baixo e 22% são de alto risco. Os resultados poderiam ser mais satisfatórios se tivéssemos maior número de pacientes no baixo risco (10) . Todas as variáveis analisadas não mostraram nenhuma significância em relação ao controle bioquímico.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified