2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for testing Lorentz and CPT symmetry with antiprotons

Abstract: A brief overview of the prospects of testing Lorentz and CPT symmetry with antimatter experiments is presented. The models discussed are applicable to atomic spectroscopy experiments, Penning-trap experiments and gravitational tests. Comments about the sensitivity of the most recent antimatter experiments to the models reviewed here are included.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Antiproton physics in the ELENA era'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows an important feature, viz. that unlike the |d → |d 27 To compare with [103,115] (see also [122]), these references rewrite the SME tensor couplings in a spherical basis then, after making appropriate field redefinitions, consider the isotropic components which are sufficient to describe the = 0 states. In their notation, with couplings a NR njm , the dictionary to compare with (3.22) and (3.23) is then a NR 000 = a 0 + a (5) and a NR 200 = 1 3 tr a transition, the |c → |c transition has a contribution at O(1) in the fine structure constant, albeit highly suppressed by a magnetic field factor.…”
Section: S -2s Antihydrogen Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It shows an important feature, viz. that unlike the |d → |d 27 To compare with [103,115] (see also [122]), these references rewrite the SME tensor couplings in a spherical basis then, after making appropriate field redefinitions, consider the isotropic components which are sufficient to describe the = 0 states. In their notation, with couplings a NR njm , the dictionary to compare with (3.22) and (3.23) is then a NR 000 = a 0 + a (5) and a NR 200 = 1 3 tr a transition, the |c → |c transition has a contribution at O(1) in the fine structure constant, albeit highly suppressed by a magnetic field factor.…”
Section: S -2s Antihydrogen Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the formula quoted in[115,122] for the SME contribution to the 1S -2S transition omits the spin-dependent couplings such as b 3 in(3.26). This is because they assume prior to calculating the energy levels that these couplings are negligible compared to a NR 200 and c 00 , on the basis of the existing experimental constraints given in[44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we can read off the SME contributions to the 1S d -2S d and 1S c -2S c tran- 27 To compare with [97,109] (see also [116]), these references rewrite the SME tensor couplings in a spherical basis then, after making appropriate field redefinitions, restrict to the isotropic components which are sufficient to describe the = 0 states. In their notation, the dictionary to compare with (3.22) and (3.23) is then a NR 000 = a 0 + a (5) and a NR 200 = 1 3 tr a sitions in antihydrogen, as measured by ALPHA [1] (see Figure 4) : Although cos 2θ n 1 at the high magnetic field in the ALPHA trap, we have kept this dependence here.…”
Section: S -2s Antihydrogen Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the formula quoted in[109,116] for the SME contribution to the 1S -2S transition omits the spin-dependent couplings such as b 3 in(3.26). This is because they assume prior to calculating the energy levels that these couplings are negligible compared to a NR 200 and c 00 , on the basis of the existing experimental constraints given in[44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles from most of the main experiments now working at the AD inform about their current status, and provide a glimpse of their visions for how they plan to exploit the ELENA upgrade to increase their physics output and explore new areas. The meeting was kicked off with theoretical inputs to inform the meeting on what, from a theoretical viewpoint, we might learn from the experimental efforts [19][20][21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%