2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for kilonova signals in the gravitational-wave era

Abstract: The binary neutron star merger gravitational-wave signal GW170817 was followed by three electromagnetic counterparts, including a kilonova arising from the radioactivity of freshly synthesized r-process elements in ejecta from the merger. Finding kilonovae after gravitational-wave triggers is crucial for (i) the search for further counterparts, such as the afterglow, (ii) probing the diversity of kilonovae and their dependence on the system’s inclination angle, and (iii) building a sample for multi-messenger c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factoring in the lower local NSNS merger rate density assumed in this work, with respect to studies that used the O2 estimate (which was higher by a factor of around three), our joint GW+EM detection rate predictions are in general agreement with most of these previous works. In particular, both Zhu et al (2021) and Mochkovitch et al (2021) find a similarly large fraction 60-80% of KNae detectable with similar thresholds as ours; factoring in the different fraction of jet-launching events (52% in this work, compared to 100% in the others), our estimate, that up to 10% of the afterglows will be detectable in radio, is in agreement with the 20% estimated by Duque et al (2019) and Saleem et al (2018). The prediction that only few percent of the NSNS events detectable in O4 through GW emission will have a detectable short GRB is in line (again factoring in our 52% fraction of jet-launching systems) with, e.g., Belgacem et al (2019), Howell et al (2019) and Yu et al (2021), while Saleem (2020) and Mogushi et al (2019) find somewhat higher fractions (but note that the estimate for sub-threshold GW detections triggered by GRB detec-tions from Saleem 2020 is in good agreement with ours).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Factoring in the lower local NSNS merger rate density assumed in this work, with respect to studies that used the O2 estimate (which was higher by a factor of around three), our joint GW+EM detection rate predictions are in general agreement with most of these previous works. In particular, both Zhu et al (2021) and Mochkovitch et al (2021) find a similarly large fraction 60-80% of KNae detectable with similar thresholds as ours; factoring in the different fraction of jet-launching events (52% in this work, compared to 100% in the others), our estimate, that up to 10% of the afterglows will be detectable in radio, is in agreement with the 20% estimated by Duque et al (2019) and Saleem et al (2018). The prediction that only few percent of the NSNS events detectable in O4 through GW emission will have a detectable short GRB is in line (again factoring in our 52% fraction of jet-launching systems) with, e.g., Belgacem et al (2019), Howell et al (2019) and Yu et al (2021), while Saleem (2020) and Mogushi et al (2019) find somewhat higher fractions (but note that the estimate for sub-threshold GW detections triggered by GRB detec-tions from Saleem 2020 is in good agreement with ours).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As a final remark, our estimates make GRB170817A an extremely lucky event (in line with, e.g., Mochkovitch et al 2021, but see also Perna et al 2021), which is not going to repeat soon. Given the excellent agreement of our model predictions with the short GRB cumulative peak flux distribution observed by Fermi/GBM and Swift/BAT (see Figure 11 in the Appendix), we consider this a robust statement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The merger rates determine prospects for future Earth-based and space-borne gravitational-wave detectors, and will impact detector design (Amaro-Seoane et al 2017;Adhikari et al 2019;Reitze et al 2019). Merger rates feed into constraints or predictions on other observables, ranging from kilonovae associated with binary NS mergers (e.g., Kasliwal et al 2020;Mochkovitch et al 2021) to gravitational-wave stochastic backgrounds (Abbott et al 2016a) to, possibly, fast radio bursts (e.g., Zhang 2020). This, then, is an opportune time for a review of the current state of the observations and predictions of compact object merger rates-and, given the expectation of continuing rapid development in this field, it particularly calls for a Living Review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19]. Unfortunately however, such joint observations are predicted to be rare in future science runs [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%