2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective therapeutic agents for obesity: Molecular modification approaches of centrally and peripherally acting selective cannabinoid 1 receptor antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, reinstating FAAH activity to consequently suppress AEA levels may be sufficient to reverse an obese state and thus supports the putative efficacy of antiobesity therapies targeting the eCB system. Indeed, CB1 receptor antagonists have proven effective at combatting obesity, but their utility was compromised by the fact that they also cause significant psychiatric side effects (58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, reinstating FAAH activity to consequently suppress AEA levels may be sufficient to reverse an obese state and thus supports the putative efficacy of antiobesity therapies targeting the eCB system. Indeed, CB1 receptor antagonists have proven effective at combatting obesity, but their utility was compromised by the fact that they also cause significant psychiatric side effects (58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical terms, a surrogate decision-maker for body fat content is the body mass index (BMI), which exceeds 30 kg/m 2 called obesity [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CB1R has been regarded as an attractive therapeutic target for obesity for the past two decades (Di Marzo et al, 2011; Gatta-Cherifi and Cota, 2015; Kaur et al, 2016; Lu et al, 2016). The first-in-class selective CB1R antagonist and inverse agonist rimonabant (Acomplia; SR141716A), which was successfully approved and introduced into the European market in June of 2006, was anticipated to provide an effective treatment for obesity (Di Marzo, 2008; Sharma et al, 2014). Unfortunately, undesirable neuropsychiatric adverse effects, including anxiety, depression, and suicide were observed in some patients, and these central nervous system effects led to the withdrawal of SR141716A from the market in October of 2008 (Janero and Makriyannis, 2009; Le Foll et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%