2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective, study comparing the accuracy of two different stool antigen tests (Premier Platinum HpSA and novel ImmunoCard STAT! rapid test) for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available SATs for H. pylori include both enzyme immuno assay (EIA) test kits for use in laboratories, as well as rapid immunochromatography tests for near patient testing by the gastroenterologist or general practitioner 102 105. In most comparative studies, laboratory-based EIA tests performed better than rapid tests,103 106 107 but the best rapid tests do have acceptable performance for clinical diagnostic use 108 109. Results vary substantially between the different available rapid tests.…”
Section: Wg 2: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available SATs for H. pylori include both enzyme immuno assay (EIA) test kits for use in laboratories, as well as rapid immunochromatography tests for near patient testing by the gastroenterologist or general practitioner 102 105. In most comparative studies, laboratory-based EIA tests performed better than rapid tests,103 106 107 but the best rapid tests do have acceptable performance for clinical diagnostic use 108 109. Results vary substantially between the different available rapid tests.…”
Section: Wg 2: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same HpSA test, a study conducted with 232 children in Northern Vietnam in 2008 reported a sensitivity of 96.6% compared to positive H. pylori culture and a specificity of 94.9% compared to negative serology (14). Another study in Spanish adults indicated a lower sensitivity of 72% and a similar specificity of 95% (16). However, using histological examination as the reference standard, a study conducted in Indonesia showed a sensitivity of 91.7% but a low specificity of 22.2% ( 17) while a study in Iraq found a low sensitivity of 36% but a specificity of 100% (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is worth noting that the EIA-based test exhibits a diminished level of precision and specificity compared to that of the ICA-based test ( Shimoyama, 2013 ). Furthermore, the EIA-based test has a lower level of accuracy and specificity than that of the ICA-based test ( McNicholl et al., 2020 ). The accuracy of SATs can also be affected by gastrointestinal bleeding and antibiotics, similar to that for UBTs.…”
Section: Diagnostic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For children, however, it is more effective to use monoclonal antibodies than polyclonal SAT (Zhou et al, (Shimoyama, 2013). Furthermore, the EIA-based test has a lower level of accuracy and specificity than that of the ICA-based test (McNicholl et al, 2020). The accuracy of SATs can also be affected by gastrointestinal bleeding and antibiotics, similar to that for UBTs.…”
Section: Non-invasive Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%