2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Randomized Blind Controlled Trial Comparing Sutures, Tape, and Octylcyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive for Skin Closure After Phlebectomy

Abstract: This study failed to demonstrate an advantage of tissue adhesive and tapes over monofilament sutures for skin closure after phlebectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with very small gaps, the tissue adhesive may seep through and prevent normal epithelialisation, ultimately disrupting the wound healing. [13]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with very small gaps, the tissue adhesive may seep through and prevent normal epithelialisation, ultimately disrupting the wound healing. [13]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly, there is little evidence-based understanding of the comparative suitability of different closure methods. Very few side-by-side studies of suture techniques have been undertaken, [1][2][3][4][5][6] and when they have, these have not been high-quality studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages include a reduced need for anesthesia, ease and speed of application, even distribution of tension across the wound, no residual suture marks, application by nonphysician personnel, and the elimination of the need for suture removal. 23 A bewildering variety of wound tapes are currently on the market. 21,22 Tapes do not work well on surfaces that are oily or hair bearing, on joint surfaces, on lax skin, on gaping wounds under tension, or on very young or uncooperative children.…”
Section: Wound Tapingmentioning
confidence: 99%