2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Multi-Institutional Study of Definitive Radiotherapy With High-Dose-Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy in Patients With Nonbulky (<4-cm) Stage I and II Uterine Cervical Cancer (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toita et al . showed the efficacy of treatment schedule with CS in a series of multicenter prospective clinical trials [35, 36], and our group demonstrated favorable results with schedule with CS in CT based 3D image-guided brachytherapy [16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toita et al . showed the efficacy of treatment schedule with CS in a series of multicenter prospective clinical trials [35, 36], and our group demonstrated favorable results with schedule with CS in CT based 3D image-guided brachytherapy [16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known that Japanese centers use lower cumulative dose schedules with shorter overall treatment time (OTT) than those of US and Europe [27,28]. Recently Toita et al showed the efficacy of Japanese schedule in a series of multicenter prospective trials in which Stage I and II with small (<4 cm) tumor diameter can be effectively treated by BED 62 Gy 10 (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2) [29] and Stage III/IVA by BED 62–65 Gy 10 at point A (JCOG1066) [30]. Therefore it is reasonable that in current study the cut-off value is much lower than Vienna group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the ACT I UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial (1996), patients were treated with 45 Gy in 20e25 fractions to the pelvis (anus up to the mid-pelvic line to include the inguinal lymph nodes), which was subsequently followed by 15 Gy in six fractions to the perineal field with electrons or photons, or by an iridium-192 implant to 25 Gy at 10 Gy per day [43]. Similar techniques can be cited for cervical cancer [44,45], head and neck cancer [46,47] and prostate cancer [48,49]. In these examples the choice of the volume for the boost was not based on any biological information, but instead it was determined by the area perceived to be at Examples of doseeresponse curves for individuals with relatively resistant tumours (blue) and for individuals with relatively sensitive tumours (orange).…”
Section: Rationale For Biologically Optimised Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%