2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9330-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Evaluation of the Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Acute Sigmoid Diverticulitis

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging is investigator independent and provides high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
57
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…US [16], CT scanning [16][17][18], and MRI [29] are increasingly proposed for evaluating suspected AD. Although US in expert hands may achieve an accuracy comparable to CT scanning [16] and MRI shows promising results [29], CT scanning is presently the most widely used tool for the initial evaluation of suspected AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…US [16], CT scanning [16][17][18], and MRI [29] are increasingly proposed for evaluating suspected AD. Although US in expert hands may achieve an accuracy comparable to CT scanning [16] and MRI shows promising results [29], CT scanning is presently the most widely used tool for the initial evaluation of suspected AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was evaluated only in small, mainly selected patient populations [59,60]. The results of the studies allow the conclusion only that MRI with oral or rectal contrast enhancement and intravenous contrast administration yields similar results to CT. By way of reservation, however, it must be mentioned that there are no robust studies of complicated diverticulitis and of small quantities of free air in the case of concealed perforation.…”
Section: History-taking Basic Diagnostic Procedures Differential DImentioning
confidence: 94%
“…MRI has the advantage that no ionizing radiation and intravenous contrast medium are needed to reach a higher soft tissue contrast than CT. MRI is increasingly used in the acute setting for patients with acute abdominal pain, but accuracy data are still limited. Based on studies with small numbers of patients, sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diagnosing ACD vary between 86 and 100% and 88 and 100% (level B [67,68] and level C [69,70]).…”
Section: Clinical Diagnosis and Radiological Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%