2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective evaluation of peripherally inserted central catheter complications in both inpatient and outpatient settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlikely to have resulted in additional complications, however, as improved CVAD-related outcomes using this model are previously demonstrated both within our institution (HR 0.73; 95%CI 0.59-0.89) (14), and others (1,6,15). Overall, CRBSI was exceedingly rare equating to one event per 7.8 observed patient years, with a lower IR compared to other outpatient settings (12,13). Mechanical complications accounted for almost half of total CVAD-related complications, consistent with previously demonstrated outpatient CVAD complication rates (13,16,17).…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is unlikely to have resulted in additional complications, however, as improved CVAD-related outcomes using this model are previously demonstrated both within our institution (HR 0.73; 95%CI 0.59-0.89) (14), and others (1,6,15). Overall, CRBSI was exceedingly rare equating to one event per 7.8 observed patient years, with a lower IR compared to other outpatient settings (12,13). Mechanical complications accounted for almost half of total CVAD-related complications, consistent with previously demonstrated outpatient CVAD complication rates (13,16,17).…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Overall, CVAD-related AEs accounted for 23% of major and 70.1% of minor AEs. While the IR of 19.1 per 1,000 catheter-days is higher than previous studies (12,13), prospective study design and the broader inclusion of minor complications such as pain (11.6%) and bleeding around the exit site (16.8%) likely account for this. Self-administration practices were used in roughly half of admissions.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This study only considered the final positioning of the catheter tip after any repositioning maneuvers (when necessary). As for infection, Liscynesky et al 25 reported that 5% of PICCs were removed because of this complication. These authors also reported that 4% of PICCs were unnecessarily removed because of suspected infection, confirmed by negative blood cultures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com base nas categorias identificadas, pô- A cultura brasileira tem o hábito do banho de aspersão diário. Estudo de coorte americano, que acompanhou pacientes internados ou não até a retirada do PICC ou óbito para as complicações, observou, quando possível, as práticas de higiene e verificou que desses pacientes 27% realizavam banho de aspersão com cobertura do PICC e 21% se higienizavam com esponja, esta prática não esteve associada ao risco de infecção ou TVP (11) . Outro estudo qualitativo espanhol com uso domiciliar de PICC em pacientes com câncer mostrou entre seus relatos que um dos pacientes trocou o hábito do banho de aspersão diário para realizá-lo com menos frequência (12) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified