Prospective controlled trial comparing colostomy irrigation with "spontaneous-action" method.

Abstract

Reaching the consumer in the antenatal and child health services. London: DHSS-CPAG, 1978: 34-5. 15 Pembrey M. Why Corrie's Bill must give prenatal tests more leeway.

Colostomy irrigation: review of a number of technical aspects

“…Sadahiro et al (44) Fourteenth to thirtieth day PO Terranova et al (37) ; Suwanna et al (4) Two weeks Gabrielli et al (16) two to three weeks Santos, Cesaretti and Ribeiro (12) minimum of four weeks Ortiz, Martí Rague and Foulkes (39) six weeks Christensen et al (33) second or third month Rogenski, Baptista and Rogenski (45) Between the second and sixth month Stockley (8) ; Woodhouse (13) ; Williams and Johnston (22) ; Plum (46) three months Shaz's ostomy page (47) four months Venturini et al (48) about five months …”

“…Time spent Terranova et al (37) 20 to 60min Pietri, Domeniconi and Gabrielli (49) ; Valenti, Salabert and Borsot (40) about 30min Suwanna et al (4) 33min Bail et al (50) About 35min Tejido Valenti and Vargas Laguna (51) ; Garcia, Carmona and Melero (2) ; Casas, Cabrejas and Domenec (5) ; Erwin-Toth and Doughty (9) ; Santos, Cesaretti and Ribeiro (12) ; Santos et al (35) ; Shaz's ostomy page (47) 30 to 45min (38min in average) Castillo et al (3) ; Berger (11) ; Venturini et al (48) 30 to 60min (45min in average) Mazier et al (20) ; Seargeant (52) 30 to 90 min (60min in average) Plum (46) ;Viso, Beatobe and Galofré (42) 35 to 45min (40min in average) Santos and Koizumi (24) ; Santos et al (53) ; Kostov et al (54) 40 to 60min (50min in average) Jao et al (18) 45min Kretschmer (7) ; Blackley (6) ; Helios (14) ; Baumel et al (38) ; Goode (55) 45 to 60min (52min in average) Stockley (8) 45 to 75min (60min in average) Williams and Johnston (22) 53min Laucks et AL (19) 58min Erwin-Toth and Doughty (9) ; Gabrielli et al (16) ; Doran and Hardcastle (21) ; Terranova (23) ; Ventafridda (30); Perboni et al (43) ; Rogenski, Baptista and Rogenski (45) ; O'Bichere (56) ; Sanada (57) ; Amdrup & Christensen …”

“…Years later, the presentation of studies announcing the occurrence of intestinal perforations and informing that only one-third of the studied persons who used it regularly, kept using it, disturbed its usage. Such facts influenced it negatively and contributed for its abandonment in England and other European countries (16)(17)(18)(20)(21)(22) . Finally, from 1950 onwards, with the technological advances reached in the specific equipment, building a malleable cone-shaped extremity, the method became widely used, especially in the United States.…”

“…Finally, from 1950 onwards, with the technological advances reached in the specific equipment, building a malleable cone-shaped extremity, the method became widely used, especially in the United States. Later, the presentation of this knowledge, added to the better sanitary conditions of the population, improved the credibility of the method, which also started being used in European countries (8,16,20,(22)(23)(24) . Hotteinstein (25) reports that stomatherapist nurses were responsible for several positive changes for the activities developed on colostomized persons and in collaboration with industries that manufacture the specific equipment.…”

Estudo Sobre Os Resultados Da Irrigação Em Colostomizados Submetidos a Um Processo De Treinamento Sistematizado

“…A redução no uso de bolsas coletoras com o emprego da irrigação tem sido atribuída como uma das grandes vantagens do método, tanto econômica como social e psicologicamente (7,23,24,28).…”