2017
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.06084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Point-of-Care and Conventional Ultrasound in a General Diagnostic Department: Implications for Resource-Limited Settings

Abstract: Point-of-care was nearly as accurate as conventional sonography for basic, focused examinations. Observed differences in accuracy were attributed to greater variation in POC image quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EfficientNet proposed a new scaling method for depth/width/resolution whilst being 7.6´ smaller and 5.7´ faster than ResNet-152 [111]. [87] These…”
Section: Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EfficientNet proposed a new scaling method for depth/width/resolution whilst being 7.6´ smaller and 5.7´ faster than ResNet-152 [111]. [87] These…”
Section: Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Standard USG or echocardiography requires the treating physician in the ED to rely on the radiologist or cardiologist to perform it in a timely and clinically relevant manner. 11 Provided the physicians in the ED have skill at image acquisition, image interpretation, and the cognitive elements required for using POCUS, they are able to rapidly incorporate the results of the POCUS examination into the management plan without delay. In addition to this, the radiology or cardiology consultant may not be fully aware of the clinical facts of the case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%