2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40662-022-00294-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective 12-month outcomes of combined iStent inject implantation and phacoemulsification in Asian eyes with normal tension glaucoma

Abstract: Background Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is a subset of open-angle glaucoma, demonstrating glaucomatous optic nerve damage in the absence of raised intraocular pressure (IOP). NTG is more prevalent in Asian populations. While generally slow-progressing, NTG may be associated with significant central visual field loss. In recent years, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery has been added to the armamentarium of glaucoma surgery. This prospec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a study by Neuhann et al only reported a significant IOP reduction for this combined procedure after one year, but not after two years [ 19 ]. Similarly, a prospective study on this combined operation in NTG patients found only a moderate IOP reduction of 9% after one year [ 20 ]. These result appear to be in accordance with another report on combined phacoemulsification and a variety of MIGS (not including XEN-45) resulting in an 11% IOP reduction, with only 5.4% of NTG patients achieving sustained surgical success (defined as an IOP reduction ≥ 30%) after 1.5 years [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study by Neuhann et al only reported a significant IOP reduction for this combined procedure after one year, but not after two years [ 19 ]. Similarly, a prospective study on this combined operation in NTG patients found only a moderate IOP reduction of 9% after one year [ 20 ]. These result appear to be in accordance with another report on combined phacoemulsification and a variety of MIGS (not including XEN-45) resulting in an 11% IOP reduction, with only 5.4% of NTG patients achieving sustained surgical success (defined as an IOP reduction ≥ 30%) after 1.5 years [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later iteration of the iStent, the iStent Inject (Glaukos Corp., San Clemente, CA, USA), achieved US FDA approval in 2018. Ang et al [ 146 ] demonstrated minimal influence of iStent inject implantation on the MAE (−0.13 ± 0.08 D), with 82.8% of eyes achieving a post-operative refraction within 0.5 D of target in combined iStent inject implantation and phacoemulsification in Asian eyes with NTG. Ioannidis et al [ 147 ] concluded too that the iStent inject device is refractively neutral—73.9% and 98.9% of eyes were within 0.5 D and 1.0 D of the target refraction, respectively.…”
Section: Discussion: Considerations In Premium Iol Implantation In Gl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 , 18 Ang et al additionally conducted a prospective study of 30 Asian eyes with NTG and reported significant reductions in IOP (−8%) and antiglaucoma medications (−77%), with 83% of eyes remaining medication-free at 12 months. 19 The most frequent complication observed was stent occlusion by iris (10%; n=3). 19 Prospective studies have shown that iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification has a minimal effect on corneal endothelial cell loss (CECL).…”
Section: Istent Injectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 19 The most frequent complication observed was stent occlusion by iris (10%; n=3). 19 Prospective studies have shown that iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification has a minimal effect on corneal endothelial cell loss (CECL). 15 , 20 , 21 In the iStent inject pivotal trial, Samuelson et al reported CECL percentages of −13.1% and −12.3% in eyes receiving phacoemulsification-alone and phacoemulsification-iStent inject surgery, respectively, with a comparable CECL >30% observed in both groups at 24 months (10.4% vs 9.5%).…”
Section: Istent Injectmentioning
confidence: 99%