Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test

Abstract

We test the hypothesis that, when thinking about allocating money to a stock, investors mentally represent the stock by the distribution of its past returns and then evaluate this distribution in the way described by prospect theory. In a simple model of asset prices where some investors think in this way, a stock whose past return distribution has a high (low) prospect theory value earns a low (high) subsequent return, on average. We find empirical support for this prediction in the cross-section of U.S. stock returns, particularly among small-capitalization stocks where less sophisticated investors are likely to have a bigger impact on prices. We repeat our tests in 46 international stock markets and find a similar pattern in a majority of these markets. JEL classification: D03

Psychology-Based Models of Asset Prices and Trading Volume

“…As such, a model with narrow framing can likely also address the empirical patterns discussed above. , Grinblatt and Han (2005), Li and Yang (2013), and Barberis et al (2016) investigate the implications of narrow framing for asset prices; I come back to some of these papers in the next section.…”

Portfolio selection strategies and cognitive psychology biases: a behavioral evidence from the Nigerian equity market

“…From equations (7) and (8) it can be seen that the MLR model is defined to evaluate the choice and relationship of the value stock in relation to the growth stock. From the models, a unit increase in the popularity of low odds growth stock results in corresponding reduction of 1.197 in the relative high odds of investing in the value stock.…”

Studi Perbandingan Return Saham Perusahaan Perbankan dan Perusahaan Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia

“…Namun jika return sahamnya bergejolak maka teori prospek dapat dijadikan landasan. Barberis, N., Mukherjee, A., & Wang, B. (2016) Yusi (2018) bahwa tidak semua perusahaan yang listed di JII mempunyai return positif, ada beberapa dari mereka yang mengalami capital loss.…”