2002
DOI: 10.5334/jpl.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic word deletion in coordinate structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In European Portuguese, diminutive suffixes in coordinate structures behave in the same way as BP diminutive suffixes. Vigário & Frota (2002) propose that ellipsis is blocked with such suffixes so as to avoid ambiguity. Ellipsis in coordination also targets stressed affix + word structures in European Portuguese (Vigário & Frota 2002).…”
Section: Tótal Ménte Totallymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In European Portuguese, diminutive suffixes in coordinate structures behave in the same way as BP diminutive suffixes. Vigário & Frota (2002) propose that ellipsis is blocked with such suffixes so as to avoid ambiguity. Ellipsis in coordination also targets stressed affix + word structures in European Portuguese (Vigário & Frota 2002).…”
Section: Tótal Ménte Totallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vigário & Frota (2002) propose that ellipsis is blocked with such suffixes so as to avoid ambiguity. Ellipsis in coordination also targets stressed affix + word structures in European Portuguese (Vigário & Frota 2002). Given that only structures formed by two PWds are subject to this phenomenon, ellipsis is blocked in structures with unstressed prefixes (29a) and incorporating suffixes (29b), which is also observed in BP.…”
Section: Tótal Ménte Totallymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6). For example, both members of the root compound are perceived as bearing a word-level stress; the stressed vowel in the first member of the compound is not subject to vowel reduction, which affects most stressless non-high vowels in European Portuguese; and the second PW of the root compound may undergo deletion under identity (the expression monogâmico ou poligâmico may reduce to mono ou poligâmico), a phenomenon that targets PW-level constituents and that requires that what remains in the string is also a PW (on the latter phenomenon, see also Vigário and Frota 2002).…”
Section: European Portuguesementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na figura 4, fornecemos a representação arbórea da hierarquia prosódia empregada nesta tese. No português europeu (PE) e no português brasileiro (PB), os principais fenômenos que iden ficam a palavra fonológica são o bloqueio e a aplicação de várias regras fonológicas que se dão no seu domínio e a presença de um único acento primário (ou lexical), sendo este o diagnós co mais intui vo (WETZELS, 1992;BISOL, 1996BISOL, , 1999BISOL, , 2000BISOL, , 2004BISOL, , 2005SCHWINDT, 2000SCHWINDT, , 2008FROTA, 2002;VIGÁRIO, 2003SIMIONI, 2008;TO-NELI, 2009; entre outros). Fenômenos que sinalizam os limites da PW incluem: a neutralização de vogais pretônicas e pós-tônicas finais, harmonia vocálica e espraiamento de nasalidade no PB; redução vocálica e elisão de 'e' átono final no PE; processos opcionais de haplologia, de elisão vocálica e de formação de glide pré-vocálico para quebrar hiato e restrições fonotá cas no PE e no PB.…”
Section: Estrutura Prosódica Do Português: a Hierarquia Prosódicaunclassified