1983
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1983.9924474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosocial Behavior as Affected by Eye Contact, Touch, and Voice Expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was explained by the positive mood induced by the smile of the first interaction. These results were consistent with one study that tied touch, eye contact and voice expression to positive mood and helping behavior (Goldman & Fordyce, 1983).…”
Section: The Influence Of Music On Cultural Change and Social Movementssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This was explained by the positive mood induced by the smile of the first interaction. These results were consistent with one study that tied touch, eye contact and voice expression to positive mood and helping behavior (Goldman & Fordyce, 1983).…”
Section: The Influence Of Music On Cultural Change and Social Movementssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They nevertheless suggest that the touching patterns and the encoding of the corresponding hedonic sensations show the necessary plasticity for changing touching behavior under the course of a relationship. Additionally, prior behavioral work suggests a causal role of social touch in modulating affective bonds, showing that touching leads to a more positive evaluation of the toucher (9, 10, 24) and increases prosocial behavior (11,12,25,26). Regulation of the relationship-specific touch patterns could thus be a candidate mechanism in governing the emotional closeness between different individuals in one's social network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because touch may be used to persuade (Jones and Yarborough, 1985), obtain compliance with requests (Willis and Hamm, 1980), or generate prosocial behavior (Goldman and Fordyce, 1983), one way to conceptualize touch is as an influence tactic. If touch is conceptualized as an influence tactic, then supervisors who use touch effectively should demonstrate greater interpersonal influence and greater apparent sincerity.…”
Section: Touch As a Positive Workplace Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%