2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.248102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propulsion of a Two-Sphere Swimmer

Abstract: We describe experiments and simulations demonstrating the propulsion of a neutrally-buoyant swimmer that consists of a pair of spheres attached by a spring, immersed in a vibrating fluid. The vibration of the fluid induces relative motion of the spheres which, for sufficiently large amplitudes, can lead to motion of the center of mass of the two spheres. We find that the swimming speed obtained from both experiment and simulation agree and collapse onto a single curve if plotted as a function of the streaming … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed it is known that the scallop theorem does not hold in complex fluids [38]; fluid inertia, nearby surfaces, elasticity of the swimmer body, or interaction with other swimmers are some other reasons why a reciprocal gait for a swimmer may lead to net motion [38]. In truth, the motivation for this work came from the interesting experimental and computational works of Klotsa et al [39] and Jones et al [40] who show that an assembly of two rigid collinear spheres with a single degree of freedom can swim in the presence of inertia, and can in fact also reverse its direction at higher Reynolds number. Felderhof [41] then theoretically studied the effect of inertia on the motion of such collinear swimmers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed it is known that the scallop theorem does not hold in complex fluids [38]; fluid inertia, nearby surfaces, elasticity of the swimmer body, or interaction with other swimmers are some other reasons why a reciprocal gait for a swimmer may lead to net motion [38]. In truth, the motivation for this work came from the interesting experimental and computational works of Klotsa et al [39] and Jones et al [40] who show that an assembly of two rigid collinear spheres with a single degree of freedom can swim in the presence of inertia, and can in fact also reverse its direction at higher Reynolds number. Felderhof [41] then theoretically studied the effect of inertia on the motion of such collinear swimmers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. special interest: [114]: This paper introduces a smart utilization of acoustic streaming for self-propulsion. The combination of simulations and experiments gives a clear understanding of the mechanisms at play.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the parameters given in section 2. k =´--. The shaking period T is chosen so, that the capsule's inertia is significant and the capsule is sufficiently deformed: T/τ v ≈2 and T/τ k ≈0.9 (see equations (26) and (37)).…”
Section: Actuation Of a Symmetric Capsule In A Non-symmetrically Shakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-dependence of the shaking determines also the direction of passive swimming. This motion is distinct from particle locomotion in oscillatory flows at finite Re, where propulsion is related to streaming flows and a fluid jet in the wake of the swimmer [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%