2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.stomax.2010.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propriétés mécaniques des membranes de collagène

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6-D), which could be justified by the plasticizing effect of PBS [78]. Moreover, the ultimate tensile stress and the Young's modulus decreased in wet conditions comparing to the dry ones, which are in accordance with some findings already reported about the mechanical resistance of some polymeric and composite membranes [82,83] and also regarding the mechanical behavior of commercial resorbable membranes for periodontal regeneration [82,84,85]. In the wet state, formulations containing Ag-BGs (F3 and F4) presented higher Young's modulus values, but for the ultimate strain (ε B ) they presented lower values than the control ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6-D), which could be justified by the plasticizing effect of PBS [78]. Moreover, the ultimate tensile stress and the Young's modulus decreased in wet conditions comparing to the dry ones, which are in accordance with some findings already reported about the mechanical resistance of some polymeric and composite membranes [82,83] and also regarding the mechanical behavior of commercial resorbable membranes for periodontal regeneration [82,84,85]. In the wet state, formulations containing Ag-BGs (F3 and F4) presented higher Young's modulus values, but for the ultimate strain (ε B ) they presented lower values than the control ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, in agreement with previous findings reported by other LbL works [60,86], all formulations were stiffer than the uncrosslinked ones. Regarding the mechanical performance of the films in wet state, since tensile strength values between 1.6 and 22.5 MPa and Young's Modulus between 10 and 70.9 MPa [84,85,87] have been reported with biodegradable membranes for guided bone regeneration, it can be seen that the developed films presented values with the same order of magnitude of the ones typically used in the clinics for the envisaged applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…According to the manufacturer's instructions for use, the membranes should be placed in saline before placement in situ. However, Coïc et al [28], found that extensive moistening considerably alters the mechanical properties of the membranes, an observation that is in accordance with the present results. In contrast, this does not happen to the Ossix Plus crossed-linked membrane, which has a fragile response to the application of tensile forces in either the dry or wet condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The tensile test is an easy way to compare different materials, however it is not the most common mechanical stress to which membranes for periodontal regeneration are usually subjected. Material failure under tensile load is quite difficult in the guided bone regeneration/guided tissue regeneration GBR/GTR application [47,48]. Failure of this type of materials is much more probably provoked by tearing during placement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%