Propriété privée, propriété de soi et sens du collectif. La « coopérative d'habitat Le Grand Portail » à Nanterre (France)

Carriou, Claire

doi:10.3917/esp.156.0213

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This supports the generalised prejudice that collaborative housing mainly targets white well-educated elites . More recently, however, people are paying attention to the potential economic and social benefits of collaborative housing, as a solution to find affordable ways of living in the city Harris, 1999;, and to enhance social inclusion, such as the integration of refugees and ethnic minorities (Carriou, 2014;Czischke & Huisman, 2018;Jarvis & Bonnett, 2013).…”

Section: Collaborative Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a new Existenzminimum

Brysch

2024

Architecture and the Built Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This thesis brings forward the design dimension, and, more specifically, co-design, to the study of housing affordability. Co-design occurs when end-users and professionals work together towards a common goal. It is a process often applied in collaborative housing, an umbrella concept encompassing different housing forms based on collective self-organisation and collaboration, where residents choose to share certain spaces. The aim of this research is to assess if and how co-design processes applied in collaborative housing may reduce building costs, thereby making these housing projects not only affordable, but even more affordable than mainstream housing. It does so by combining a case study approach with a building costs simulation. Findings indicate that co-design decisions based on a collective self-redefinition of Existenzminimum (minimum dwelling) affect the housing layout and contribute to reduce building costs. By conceptualising housing design through the lenses of affordability, this thesis highlights the understated role of architectural design and building costs as key components in the study and provision of affordable housing solutions; and enriches the existing body of knowledge on affordable collaborative housing. Moreover, it draws attention to the way some outdated building regulations and standards hamper design innovation in housing. This research ends up with a set of general principles for the co-design of affordable collaborative housing. These design principles may assist professionals supporting co-design and, more importantly, people who want to design, build and live in a collaborative manner.

show abstract

Section: Collaborative Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a new Existenzminimum

Brysch

2024

Architecture and the Built Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In other cases property relations are not mentioned explicitly. Carriou (2014) discusses the example of the "Hoche cooperative" in Nanterre. While low-cost access to homeownership is listed as a prime motivation for residents, it is unclear what concrete rights residents hold with respect to their housing unit.…”

Section: Tenure In Collaborative Housingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Owns Collaborative Housing? A Conceptual Typology of Property Regimes

Bossuyt

2021

Housing, Theory and Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tenure in collaborative housing remains under contextualized. Unpacking tenure contributes to internal differentiation of collaborative housing, its comparison to other modes of housing provision and the evaluation of potential benefits. This paper develops an ideal-typical typology of tenure through property regimes. These constitute social arrangements regarding the allocation of rights, rules and roles with respect to a resource. In terms of organizational characteristics, collaborative housing is based on limited common property, self-governance and sets of internal rules. While sharing these characteristics with other residential communities, collaborative housing can be differentiated by virtue of collectively held management and commissioning rights. Property regimes are a mediating variable for both positive and negative effects attributed to collaborative housing.

show abstract

“…Or, nos observations ont révélé que le degré d'implication des habitants détermine le degré de constitution du collectif, sa pérennité et ce faisant sa capacité à impulser des projets qui dépasseraient l'échelle de l'immeuble pour celle du quartier. Un encadrement fort n'annihile bien sûr pas la constitution d'une dynamique collective comme le montre l'exemple de la coopérative d'habitat de Nanterre (Carriou, 2014). Mais cette dynamique collective s'est surtout instaurée autour d'un projet d'accession privée et ne semble pas se doubler de velléités d'animation d'une vie de quartier.…”

Section: Un Système D'acteurs Qui Peut êTre Imposéunclassified

L’habitat participatif : d’une greffe à un noyau des écoquartiers

Devaux¹

2015

developpementdurable

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Propriété privée, propriété de soi et sens du collectif. La « coopérative d'habitat Le Grand Portail » à Nanterre (France)

Cited by 11 publications

References 7 publications

Towards a new Existenzminimum

Towards a new Existenzminimum

Who Owns Collaborative Housing? A Conceptual Typology of Property Regimes

L’habitat participatif : d’une greffe à un noyau des écoquartiers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About