Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2005
DOI: 10.2523/97161-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proppant Flowback Prevention-A New Technology for Low BHST Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Proppant flow back was experimentally conducted by several researchers (i.e., Parker et al (1999); Nguyen and Weaver (2003); Weaver et al (1999); Vreeberg et al (1994); Rickards et al (1998); Johnson et al (2005). Results indicate that adding polymer to proppant can prevent proppant erosion and increase the particles tolerance to higher stress cycles.…”
Section: Fines Generationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Proppant flow back was experimentally conducted by several researchers (i.e., Parker et al (1999); Nguyen and Weaver (2003); Weaver et al (1999); Vreeberg et al (1994); Rickards et al (1998); Johnson et al (2005). Results indicate that adding polymer to proppant can prevent proppant erosion and increase the particles tolerance to higher stress cycles.…”
Section: Fines Generationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results obtained by Terracina et al (2010), Browne and Wilson (2003) and Peard et al (1991) suggest that in contrast to conventional proppants, RCP is the most effective method to prevent proppant flowback. Moreover, Anderson et al (2002) and Johnson et al (2005) have demonstrated that RCP is capable of preventing proppant flowback in high temperature, high rate wells, and low temperature wells.…”
Section: Proppant Flowbackmentioning
confidence: 97%