2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a pathway for enteric virus groups detection as indicators of faecal contamination to enhance the evaluation of microbiological quality in freshwater in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microbiological quality of these recreational surface waters was monitored by the determination of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB). Our results did not show a relationship between EV and RVA detection and bacterial contamination, in line with what has been previously proposed (Aguirre et al 2019, Masachessi et al 2021. Masachessi et al (2021) even proposed a pipeline involving the detection of picobirnavirus, human adenovirus and infectious EV in samples with FIB within acceptable limits by the guidelines as a way to improve the assessment of microbiological quality in freshwater, in addition to reporting the presence of other enteric viruses, such as RVA.…”
Section: Escherichia Colisupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The microbiological quality of these recreational surface waters was monitored by the determination of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB). Our results did not show a relationship between EV and RVA detection and bacterial contamination, in line with what has been previously proposed (Aguirre et al 2019, Masachessi et al 2021. Masachessi et al (2021) even proposed a pipeline involving the detection of picobirnavirus, human adenovirus and infectious EV in samples with FIB within acceptable limits by the guidelines as a way to improve the assessment of microbiological quality in freshwater, in addition to reporting the presence of other enteric viruses, such as RVA.…”
Section: Escherichia Colisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These viruses cause several clinical manifestations, ranging from mild (respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, herpangina and hand-footand-mouth disease) to severe diseases (pleurodynia, hepatitis, myopericarditis, pancreatitis, meningitis, encephalitis, paralysis, and neonatal sepsis) (De Crom et al 2016). The EV is a known waterborne pathogen, with well documented spread in recreational water in both developed and developing countries and its use as a viral indicator of fecal contamination in these water matrices is also suggested (Allman et al 2013, Lee et al 2014, Maurer et al 2015, Sarmirova et al 2016, Aguirre et al 2019, Masachessi et al 2021.…”
Section: _________________ Corresponding Editor: María S Morales Cova...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the microbiological contamination of surface water courses can potentially make these water resources an important source of dissemination of viral agents and of viral infection risk for people exposed to these waters [35,36]. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic continues to raise various questions about its infective potential in the different watercourses where it is found, particularly in freshwater sources that are affected by poorly treated or untreated wastewater, and in those water resources that serve as key health spaces for the recovery of patients affected by diseases [11].…”
Section: Infective Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteric viruses, such as Human mastadenovirus (HAdV) and Enterovirus (EV), are important waterborne pathogens that have the potential to indicate fecal contamination and, thus, can be used as complementary indicators to improve the assessment of microbiological water quality (Masachessi et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2018). They have been detected in domestic wastewater and various types of drinking water sources worldwide and make up the Contaminant Candidate List 4 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), which brings together contaminants that, despite having a high prevalence in fecally contaminated water, are not regulated as water quality analysis parameters (La Rosa et al, 2012;U.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%