2016 IEEE International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/epepemc.2016.7752014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a novel control method of Li-ion battery system for regenerative energy utilization in traction power supply system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Catenary-free operation  Electric network ownership  Electric network characteristic Onboard SC Maximum energy recovery [134] Onboard SC Maximum energy recovery [135] Onboard SC Maximum energy recovery [61] On board SC Maximum energy recovery [136] Wayside SC Power flow control [137] Wayside Li-C Power flow control [138] Wayside SC Maximum energy recovery [139] Wayside SC Maximum energy recovery [140] Wayside SC Maximum energy recovery [141] Wayside SC Improve dynamic performance of system [142] Wayside SC constant voltage-based energy management strategy [143] Wayside SC Energy management control [144] Wayside Li-C Energy management control [108] Wayside Li-C Line voltage control [145] Flywheel Line voltage control [146] Flywheel Line voltage control [147] Battery Peak load shifting [148] Battery Maximum energy recovery [149] Hybrid bat-SC Energy management control [150]  Vehicles  Headways Catenary-free operation provides an opportunity for vehicles, especially tramway, to run without connection to the overhead line. It is a good solution for operating trams in, for instance, historic areas.…”
Section: Energy Storage Control and Energy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Catenary-free operation  Electric network ownership  Electric network characteristic Onboard SC Maximum energy recovery [134] Onboard SC Maximum energy recovery [135] Onboard SC Maximum energy recovery [61] On board SC Maximum energy recovery [136] Wayside SC Power flow control [137] Wayside Li-C Power flow control [138] Wayside SC Maximum energy recovery [139] Wayside SC Maximum energy recovery [140] Wayside SC Maximum energy recovery [141] Wayside SC Improve dynamic performance of system [142] Wayside SC constant voltage-based energy management strategy [143] Wayside SC Energy management control [144] Wayside Li-C Energy management control [108] Wayside Li-C Line voltage control [145] Flywheel Line voltage control [146] Flywheel Line voltage control [147] Battery Peak load shifting [148] Battery Maximum energy recovery [149] Hybrid bat-SC Energy management control [150]  Vehicles  Headways Catenary-free operation provides an opportunity for vehicles, especially tramway, to run without connection to the overhead line. It is a good solution for operating trams in, for instance, historic areas.…”
Section: Energy Storage Control and Energy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to EDLCs, the FWs show a higher energy density and much higher number of charging/discharging cycles (i.e., higher than 1,000,000), but they do have a significantly reduced power density and a need for frequent maintenance. A more cost-effective solution for recovering the train braking energy through a SERS-type arrangement is the one that relies on electrochemical cell batteries, particularly those ones based on lithium-ion technology [29][30][31][32], as this solution is recognised to have a higher value of energy density and lower payback time, if compared with both EDLCs and FWs. Therefore, in consideration of such favourable characteristics the study described in this paper has been developed with a SERS arrangement that combines together the distributed energy storage made available by the batteries of an EV fleet parked nearby the railways station, and a centralised energy storage that could be set up by means of the so-called second-life EV batteries.…”
Section: Energy Recovery Systems For Train Regenerative Brakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oversizing might unnecessarily increase the weight and volume of OESSs, while undersizing could be critical for energy efficiency and time-schedule compliance [4]. For the broader use of energy storage systems and reductions in energy consumption and its associated local environmental impacts, the following challenges must be addressed by academic and industrial research: increasing the energy and power density, reliability, cyclability, and cost competitiveness of chemical and electrochemical energy storage devices [5,6]; integrate onboard and wayside storage systems and develop efficient control strategies for energy sources [7][8][9][10][11][12]; increase the power density of electronic converters and introduce new concepts and materials for traction motors [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%