2014
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.19623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal for a new staging system for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible

Abstract: A new staging system for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible has been retrospectively applied to a group of 31 patients. In this system clinicoradiographic signs and symptoms are incorporated in a simplified manner. For imaging purposes the use of plain radiographs such as periapical films and panoramic radiographs is recommended, mainly because of their readily availability. The presented staging system seems well reproducible, facilitating the comparison of study groups dealing with the various issues of oste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… Stage 0: mucosal defects only; bone exposed  Stage I: radiological evidence of necrotic bone, dento-alveolar only  Stage II: positive radiographic findings above ID canal with denuded bone intraorally  Stage III: clinically exposed radionecrotic bone, verified by imaging techniques, along with skin fistulas and infection with addition of potential or actual pathological fracture. Radiological evidence of bone necrosis within the radiation field, where tumour recurrence has been excluded (Dhanda et al, 2016) (Deshpande et al, 2015 (Karagozoglu, et al. 2014) (Shaw and Dhanda, 2011) (Notani, et al.…”
Section: Osteoradionecrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Stage 0: mucosal defects only; bone exposed  Stage I: radiological evidence of necrotic bone, dento-alveolar only  Stage II: positive radiographic findings above ID canal with denuded bone intraorally  Stage III: clinically exposed radionecrotic bone, verified by imaging techniques, along with skin fistulas and infection with addition of potential or actual pathological fracture. Radiological evidence of bone necrosis within the radiation field, where tumour recurrence has been excluded (Dhanda et al, 2016) (Deshpande et al, 2015 (Karagozoglu, et al. 2014) (Shaw and Dhanda, 2011) (Notani, et al.…”
Section: Osteoradionecrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being an entity well known by health professionals who deal with the treatment of head and neck cancer, ORN presents many controversies. From its classification to its best therapeutic (He, et al, 2015;Lyons, et al, 2014;Karagozoglu, et al, 2014). For initial lesions, conservative management can be used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clinical characteristics relevant to the original disease were not included in this system, in addition to losing their efficiency of classification when the anti-fibrotic tissue factor is removed. Whereas in the staging elaborated by Karazoglu et al 10 , the approach was more extensive and is based on a combination of clinical and radiological findings, symptoms, and presence or absence of oral and/or cutaneous fistulas in patients with ORN located in the mandibular region (Table 5).…”
Section: Systems Of Evaluation Of Ornmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevention of this condition should be a priority in the dental team through the elimination of possible infectious foci before starting the locoregional radiotherapy. In cases of necessity of traumatic dental procedures after radiotherapy, procedures must be used that aim to minimize this risk 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%