2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02978-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic abdominal or retroperitoneal drain placement in major uro-oncological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on radical prostatectomy, cystectomy and partial nephrectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…I appreciate the efforts—I went “cold turkey” over a year ago in dropping routine drains and have no concerns with this change in practice. For further reading, see the systematic review by Kowalewski et al 2 , which looks at drain use across all urologic cancers and shows similar results. To the Clinic… The study by Hurle et al 3 looks at a not too uncommon clinical problem—the high‐grade non‐invasive bladder cancer patient with BCG unresponsive outcome. The gold standard is early cystectomy; however, in this series of 36 patients who refused cystectomy, a salvage treatment with intravesical gemcitabine yielded at 24‐month 32% disease‐specific survival, and without high‐grade toxicity.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I appreciate the efforts—I went “cold turkey” over a year ago in dropping routine drains and have no concerns with this change in practice. For further reading, see the systematic review by Kowalewski et al 2 , which looks at drain use across all urologic cancers and shows similar results. To the Clinic… The study by Hurle et al 3 looks at a not too uncommon clinical problem—the high‐grade non‐invasive bladder cancer patient with BCG unresponsive outcome. The gold standard is early cystectomy; however, in this series of 36 patients who refused cystectomy, a salvage treatment with intravesical gemcitabine yielded at 24‐month 32% disease‐specific survival, and without high‐grade toxicity.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…I appreciate the efforts—I went “cold turkey” over a year ago in dropping routine drains and have no concerns with this change in practice. For further reading, see the systematic review by Kowalewski et al 2 , which looks at drain use across all urologic cancers and shows similar results. To the Clinic… The study by Hurle et al 3 looks at a not too uncommon clinical problem—the high‐grade non‐invasive bladder cancer patient with BCG unresponsive outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Считалось, что методом профилактики является установка страховых дренажей. Однако в недавнем систематическом обзоре и метаанализе было продемонстрировано, что нет корреляции отсутствия страховых дренажей с формированием симптоматических ЛК после ТЛАЭ [14][15][16].…”
Section: таблица 2 клинико-патологическая характеристика двух группunclassified
“…Findings concluded for prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy, the placement of a drain can be omitted unless there is a deviation from the standard care. However, for RC, the evidence was insufficient to suggest drain omission …”
Section: Intraoperative Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%