2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2005.06.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of plastic scintillators after irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The given linearity factor is likely to be of acceptable for many irradiations since PSDs have been shown to be robust toward scintillation deterioration. They experience only a small gradual decrease in light emission with accumulated dose 20,34 . Studies have shown that the relative response and quenching of plastic scintillators at these energies change substantially with small changes in photon energy 20–23 , and the intrinsic scintillation response of a specific PSD must therefore be comprehensively known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The given linearity factor is likely to be of acceptable for many irradiations since PSDs have been shown to be robust toward scintillation deterioration. They experience only a small gradual decrease in light emission with accumulated dose 20,34 . Studies have shown that the relative response and quenching of plastic scintillators at these energies change substantially with small changes in photon energy 20–23 , and the intrinsic scintillation response of a specific PSD must therefore be comprehensively known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They experience only a small gradual decrease in light emission with accumulated dose. 20,34 Studies have shown that the relative response and quenching of plastic scintillators at these energies change substantially with small changes in photon energy 20-23, and the intrinsic scintillation response of a specific PSD must therefore be comprehensively known. Therefore, this investigation used MC to score the relative dose to water and polystyrene to correct for the energy-dependent response of the scintillator, and the intrinsic energy dependence of the PSD was thus not investigated.…”
Section: MCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complete description of the Time-Of-Flight system employed at BESIII, its design and arrangement can be found in the articles [1,4]. Since TOF usually operates in a radiation environment, the radiation damage, including light transmission, light output, excitation and emission spectra, of Bicron 408 and other two types of plastic scintillators had been experimentally studied [17] in the research and design stage of TOF system at BESIII. The performance of fine-mesh Hamamatsu R5924 PMT had also been investigated in a strong magnetic field up to 1T [18], and an exponential dependence of the relative gain on the working voltage was observed.…”
Section: The Barrel Time-of-flight Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Commercial plastic scintillators EJ-200 (Eljen Technology), BC-404 and BC-408 (Saint-Gobain Crystals and Detectors) were exposed to large irradiation doses from a 60 Co source (185 MBq) with a 3162 Gy/h dose rate. 5 Among the three materials, EJ-200 was concluded to have the best behavior. A substantial change of the photophysical response was observed for all samples at a radiation dose of 14.4 kGy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%