2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of ERS-1/2 coherence in the Siberian boreal forest and implications for stem volume retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IWCM has been used for C-band data in order to derive stem volume from coherence, and it was found to be suitable for the retrieval of stem volume at several test sites in Sweden and Finland. For the one-day repeat-pass interval of the European Remote Sensing ERS-1/2 mission, the coherence for stable winter conditions was found to be useful for stem volume estimation [13,14,36,37], while the interferometric phase height was found unstable [38]. As will be illustrated below, it is instead primarily the interferometric phase height which has the highest sensitivity to biomass for TanDEM-X.…”
Section: Interferometric Water Cloud Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The IWCM has been used for C-band data in order to derive stem volume from coherence, and it was found to be suitable for the retrieval of stem volume at several test sites in Sweden and Finland. For the one-day repeat-pass interval of the European Remote Sensing ERS-1/2 mission, the coherence for stable winter conditions was found to be useful for stem volume estimation [13,14,36,37], while the interferometric phase height was found unstable [38]. As will be illustrated below, it is instead primarily the interferometric phase height which has the highest sensitivity to biomass for TanDEM-X.…”
Section: Interferometric Water Cloud Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The limited capability of the ALS first/last return data to explain the GSV variability due to forest structural differences in the horizontal forest growth dimension for stands with similar CH entails that, in order to produce GSV estimates without systematic bias when extrapolating from field data to ALS transects and eventually to the area covered by the spaceborne imagery, a rather large in situ dataset is required to cover not only the full range of GSV but also the regional distribution of RS, which influences the allometric relationship between CH and GSV (cf. [60]). For example, when models for the prediction of GSV are developed for stands with high RS (> 80%) and then used to estimate the GSV for stands with lower RS (<60%), the estimates are strongly biased (RMSE = 85.2 m 3 /ha, RMSEr = 36%, R 2 = 0.79, bias = 60 m 3 /ha) whereas the CH retrieval remains unbiased (RMSE= 2.1 m, RMSEr = 9.0%, R 2 = 0.89, bias = 0.02 m).…”
Section: Information Content Of the Als Canopy Structure Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, coherence maps from C-band ERS-1/2 including both volume and temporal decorrelation show a relationship with aboveground biomass [21,43] and stem volume [39,44]. Since our experiment employs a zero spatial baseline we can better examine the impacts of temporal decorrelation, in particular the interaction between weather events and forest structure on model fits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%