1980
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.1980.11739557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Awake Rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They occurred with time courses that corresponded to the periods of some minutes of stimulation. The site of these changes was always in the appropriate zone of the cortex-parasaggital contralateral parietal cortex for SEPs, and occipital cortex for VERs (Colin et al 1980, Arezzo et al 1988). The magnitude of the changes-a predominant decrease of a few per cent-was similar to those observed during single-channel impedance studies in the limbic system of cats (Adey et al 1962).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They occurred with time courses that corresponded to the periods of some minutes of stimulation. The site of these changes was always in the appropriate zone of the cortex-parasaggital contralateral parietal cortex for SEPs, and occipital cortex for VERs (Colin et al 1980, Arezzo et al 1988). The magnitude of the changes-a predominant decrease of a few per cent-was similar to those observed during single-channel impedance studies in the limbic system of cats (Adey et al 1962).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean BP increased on stimulation by 15 ± 5 mm Hg. The SEPs were typically 30 µV in amplitude, with latencies of P1 13.8 ± 1.5 and N1 32.8 ± 3.0 ms (n = 5 in three animals, nomenclature as Colin et al (1980)) (see figure 6).…”
Section: Eit Images During Somatosensory Evoked Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the human cortex gyri disort the currentflow, making it difficult to choose between the possible orientations of the putative dipoles. The rabbit proved to be a suitable model, its parietal contralateral cortical evoked response after forelimb stimulation ( COLIN et al, 1980) being similar to the postrolandic response in man. Their simpler vertical processing-units (KILLACKEY, 1983) can be compared to the primate cortex's columnar organization.…”
Section: Interchangeability Of Stimulus Intensity and Duration For VImentioning
confidence: 87%