1994
DOI: 10.1016/0925-9635(94)90176-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of bulk polycrystalline CVD diamond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have successfully fabricated high-quality polycrystalline diamond and reported that, in a diamond radiation sensor, irradiation with 5.48-MeV alpha particles resulted in a wellresolved particle peak with a high charge collection efficiency of 15% [8], [9]. Here, using our high-quality polycrystalline diamond film, we report significant progress in fabricating FETs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We have successfully fabricated high-quality polycrystalline diamond and reported that, in a diamond radiation sensor, irradiation with 5.48-MeV alpha particles resulted in a wellresolved particle peak with a high charge collection efficiency of 15% [8], [9]. Here, using our high-quality polycrystalline diamond film, we report significant progress in fabricating FETs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Table 1: Relevant physical properties of diamond and sand. The data for the silica sand are taken from Telling and Field [7] and Shipway and Hutchings [14] while the data for diamond are taken from Sussmann et al [15]. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Table 7: Values of α and β parameters for a number of particle and target combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness range of the diamond films were between 33 µm and 90 µm. The coated specimens were 50 mm diameter and 6 mm thick and were tested in the as-received Figure 1 shows an electron micrograph of an untested diamond coating while Table 1 lists the relevant properties of the coatings [7,14,15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substrate properties (e.g. dielectric constant 1 R ¼ 5.7 and loss tangent smaller than 10 25 from the literature [9]) and contact metallisation conductivity make the software able to simulate impedance matching and electrical lengths, suggesting compromises between contact thickness and waveguide length. Coplanar waveguides, according to a measurement setup equipped with ground-signal-ground (GSG) probes with 200 mm pitch, result in a median conductor strip of 106 mm width separated from two ground guides, of 210 mm width, by a gap of 20 mm: software simulation guarantees 50 V impedance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%