“…For churn flow at z = 3.0 m, εD U 3 increased only slightly in comparison with that at z = 1.0 m. However, for bubbly flow, the value of εD U 3 more than doubled at z = 3.0 m in comparison to z = 1.0 m, which is consistent with the literature (Griffiths, 2012). Thus, at z = 3.0 m, the normalized total energy dissipation rate for churn flow was around 2.5 times that of bubbly flow, which is consistent with the ratio of 2.0 of maximum streamwise turbulence intensities between churn flow and bubbly flow ( Figure S8) (Iqbal & Thomas, 2007;Poole & Hall, 2014;Rahai & Wong, 2002;Shim et al, 2013).…”