Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis on the levels of oxidative stress markers and antioxidants in keratoconus compared to healthy subject. Method The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were searched on 1st June 2020 for studies reporting oxidative and antioxidative stress markers in keratoconus and healthy controls. Main meta‐analysis was stratified by type of biomarkers, type of samples (tears, cornea, aqueous humour and blood) and type of corneal samples (stromal cells, epithelium and endothelium). Results We included 36 articles, for a total of 1328 keratoconus patients and 1208 healthy controls. There is an overall increase in oxidative stress markers in keratoconus compared with healthy controls (standard mean deviation (SMD) = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.55–1.33), with a significant increase in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (1.09, 0.41–1.78) and malondialdehyde (1.78, 0.83–2.73). There is an overall decrease in antioxidants in keratoconus compared with healthy controls (−0.63, −0.89 to −0.36), with a significant decrease in total antioxidant capacity/status (−1.65, −2.88 to −0.43), aldehyde/NADPH dehydrogenase (−0.77, −1.38 to −0.17), lactoferrin/transferrin/albumin (−1.92, −2.96 to −0.89) and selenium/zinc (−1.42, −2.23 to −0.61). Oxidative stress markers were higher in tears and in cornea of keratoconus than in aqueous humour, and antioxidants were decreased in tears, aqueous humour and blood without difference between sample type. Oxidative stress markers increased in stromal cells and antioxidants decreased in endothelium. Conclusion Oxidative stress markers and antioxidants were dysregulated in keratoconus, involving an imbalance of redox homeostasis in tears, cornea, aqueous humour and blood.
Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis on the levels of oxidative stress markers and antioxidants in keratoconus compared to healthy subject. Method The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were searched on 1st June 2020 for studies reporting oxidative and antioxidative stress markers in keratoconus and healthy controls. Main meta‐analysis was stratified by type of biomarkers, type of samples (tears, cornea, aqueous humour and blood) and type of corneal samples (stromal cells, epithelium and endothelium). Results We included 36 articles, for a total of 1328 keratoconus patients and 1208 healthy controls. There is an overall increase in oxidative stress markers in keratoconus compared with healthy controls (standard mean deviation (SMD) = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.55–1.33), with a significant increase in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (1.09, 0.41–1.78) and malondialdehyde (1.78, 0.83–2.73). There is an overall decrease in antioxidants in keratoconus compared with healthy controls (−0.63, −0.89 to −0.36), with a significant decrease in total antioxidant capacity/status (−1.65, −2.88 to −0.43), aldehyde/NADPH dehydrogenase (−0.77, −1.38 to −0.17), lactoferrin/transferrin/albumin (−1.92, −2.96 to −0.89) and selenium/zinc (−1.42, −2.23 to −0.61). Oxidative stress markers were higher in tears and in cornea of keratoconus than in aqueous humour, and antioxidants were decreased in tears, aqueous humour and blood without difference between sample type. Oxidative stress markers increased in stromal cells and antioxidants decreased in endothelium. Conclusion Oxidative stress markers and antioxidants were dysregulated in keratoconus, involving an imbalance of redox homeostasis in tears, cornea, aqueous humour and blood.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.