2015
DOI: 10.1587/transcom.e98.b.2508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation Channel Interpolation for Fingerprint-Based Localization of Illegal Radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the online phase, the training system was placed at 10 random locations in the targeted area at 1297MHz frequency, 1MHz bandwidth and 0.5W transmit power in order to mimic the operation of unknown illegal radios. More details can be found in [35]. Figure 22 shows a comparison of the CDF of distance error between several localization algorithms.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the online phase, the training system was placed at 10 random locations in the targeted area at 1297MHz frequency, 1MHz bandwidth and 0.5W transmit power in order to mimic the operation of unknown illegal radios. More details can be found in [35]. Figure 22 shows a comparison of the CDF of distance error between several localization algorithms.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the data across the spatial domain is assumed to be generated by a Gaussian process, and regression is performed by learning the spatial covariance from measured data. Another example is regression along the frequency domain, where a log-linear model with respect to frequency is employed to predict fingerprints at any frequency [35]. In these given examples, the Gaussian distribution function and the log-linear function can be regarded as kernel functions.…”
Section: Background On Fingerprint-based Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations