2020
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2020.1728612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Propaganda Fights’ and ‘Disinformation Campaigns’: the discourse on information warfare in Russia-West relations

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be added that the model of informational influence by evoking and increasing extreme (most often negative) emotional states is a tool of psychological influence that has been used continuously and improved for decades and has been used first by Soviet and later Russian information centers (Baumann, 2020;Hejlová and Klimeš, 2019;Myers, 2015). There were many scientific centers in the Soviet Union improving so-called social control engineering to evoke and direct social moods and, if necessary, the behavior of crowds (Monica, Nicolae, and Breban, 2010).…”
Section: Research Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be added that the model of informational influence by evoking and increasing extreme (most often negative) emotional states is a tool of psychological influence that has been used continuously and improved for decades and has been used first by Soviet and later Russian information centers (Baumann, 2020;Hejlová and Klimeš, 2019;Myers, 2015). There were many scientific centers in the Soviet Union improving so-called social control engineering to evoke and direct social moods and, if necessary, the behavior of crowds (Monica, Nicolae, and Breban, 2010).…”
Section: Research Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, gaining the opportunity to influence Warsaw's political decision-making process allows influencing Brussels and Washington's foreign policy, leading to mutual animosities or the non-conflicting pursuit of specific interests. In the pessimistic variant, taking control of Warsaw would significantly weaken American influence in this part of Europe and guarantee the possibility of a strong influence on Brussels' internal decision-making process (Baumann 2020;Götz 2016;Götz 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have focused on the composition of actors involved and highlighted the contingencies of construction of HW as a security and political issue (Daniel and Eberle, 2018; Monsees, 2020; Ördén, 2019; Szostek, 2020), while others explored systemic responses to disinformation (Bjola and Papadakis, 2020; Wagnsson, 2020). A growing number of studies also dig into the political dimension of HW discourse and its entanglement with identity (re)construction of international organisations or particular countries (Baumann, 2020; Eberle and Daniel, 2019; Mälksoo, 2018). Adopting a Critical Security Studies perspective, we side with works that problematise the understanding of the problem as a single and coherent story (Monsees, 2020; Ördén, 2019).…”
Section: The Rise Of Hw Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has sought to provide a clearer picture by studying the threat, focusing directly on practices: cases of disinformation, (antagonistic) strategic narratives and fake news (e.g. Mejias andVokuev 2017, Ziegler 2018), or the practice of "information warfare" (Baumann 2020) or "hybrid warfare" (Jonson and Seeley 2015, Renz 2016). We instead propose a bottom-up approach, focusing on threat perceptions in a democratic society.…”
Section: How To Grasp the Problem With Projection Of Harmful Informatmentioning
confidence: 99%