2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60095-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pronuclear morphology differs between women more than 38 and women less than 30 years of age

Abstract: Pronuclear morphology has been reported as a good tool for studying embryo development and euploidy. Comparing two groups of women with different aneuploidy risk, women more than 38 years old (n = 28) known to be at high risk of aneuploidy, and women under 30 years old (n = 35), this study investigated whether pronuclear morphology could be used routinely as an alternative to preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in countries where PGS is prohibited. Pronuclear morphology was evaluated for 301 zygotes and re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previously reported data [19], our analysis of nucleolar morphology showed no statistically significant differences in relation to maternal ages, both in clinical pregnancy and in ongoing pregnancy/deliveries groups. This result is in contrast with recently published data showing a correlation between pronuclear morphology and maternal ages [15]. We believe that the discrepancy could be related to the different sample size and to the different maternal age between our patients and those analyzed by Maille and coworkers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with previously reported data [19], our analysis of nucleolar morphology showed no statistically significant differences in relation to maternal ages, both in clinical pregnancy and in ongoing pregnancy/deliveries groups. This result is in contrast with recently published data showing a correlation between pronuclear morphology and maternal ages [15]. We believe that the discrepancy could be related to the different sample size and to the different maternal age between our patients and those analyzed by Maille and coworkers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…An important contribution in the evaluation of embryo quality seems to come from the pronuclear and nucleolar characteristics, proposed as an indicator of embryo development and chromosomal complement in human fertilized oocytes [9-15]. Nucleoli are the sites of the synthesis of pre-RNA, and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is necessary for the translational process whereby the embryonic genome becomes fully activated [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the pronuclear and nucleolar characteristics of human zygote has been proposed as an indicator of embryo development and competence [4-10]. Previous data have suggested that zygote-score could be an efficient tool for embryo selection if combined with embryo morphology evaluation on days 2 and 3 [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve (52.2%) found a correlation [10,12,14,16,19,21,23,33],[36,39,40,43] between zygote morphology and implantation rate, while 11 studies (47.8%) did not find any correlation [15,17,26,28,30,32,34,38],[42,45,47]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%