2020
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pronto: A Multi-Sensor State Estimator for Legged Robots in Real-World Scenarios

Abstract: In this paper, we present a modular and flexible state estimation framework for legged robots operating in real-world scenarios, where environmental conditions, such as occlusions, low light, rough terrain, and dynamic obstacles can severely impair estimation performance. At the core of the proposed estimation system, called Pronto, is an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) that fuses IMU and Leg Odometry sensing for pose and velocity estimation. We also show how Pronto can integrate pose corrections from visual and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable contributions were made to Lexicographic Programming to safely handle multiple objectives with varying priorities, differential dynamic programming (DDP) to leverage the sparsity of nonlinear trajectory optimization problems, and even combinations of these two approaches [79]. This involved the development of efficient and versatile open-source software for dynamic models [80][81][82], simulation [83], state estimation [84] and control design [85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notable contributions were made to Lexicographic Programming to safely handle multiple objectives with varying priorities, differential dynamic programming (DDP) to leverage the sparsity of nonlinear trajectory optimization problems, and even combinations of these two approaches [79]. This involved the development of efficient and versatile open-source software for dynamic models [80][81][82], simulation [83], state estimation [84] and control design [85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the existing literature on legged locomotion control relies almost exclusively on state feedback, but the position and velocity of the CoM cannot be measured directly as it is a virtual point and contacts with the environment can be difficult to detect and measure. State estimation is therefore a crucial component, which has been surprisingly little explored in this respect [2,84,[89][90][91][92][93]. The reliance on state estimation and feedback makes existing legged robots extremely dependent on accurate hardware, expensive and brittle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMU odometry constrains the other odometry [21,27] as well. Other constraints are imported into the laser-visual-inertial system, such as thermal-inertial [28], and leg odometry [29]. Cao et al introduced a static ultra-wideband (UWB) anchor as a global positioning system to improve the localization accuracy [1].…”
Section: Visual-inertial Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VP controller requires estimates of the trunk state and measurements of the effective leg 3 force. State estimation for legged robots is difficult, as its rapidly changing dynamics require robust, low-latency, and high-frequency state estimates (Camurri et al, 2020). Proprioceptive sensors such as IMUs, force/torque sensors and joint encoders are able to meet these requirements, but suffer heavily from sensor drift.…”
Section: Challenges Of Implementing a Virtual Point Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paiman et al (2016) proposes a VP based observer for a wearable robotic device, which uses an IMU with an unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to estimate trunk orientation, gyros to estimate trunk angular velocity, and an accelerometer to estimate linear CoM acceleration. Recent studies improve the state estimation accuracy by sensor fusion, and include exteroceptive sensors such as cameras and LIDAR (Wisth et al, 2019;Camurri et al, 2020).…”
Section: Challenges Of Implementing a Virtual Point Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%