2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-56281/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prone Positioning in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study and Analysis of Physiology

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but it is unknown whether prone positioning improves outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to COVID-19.METHODS: A cohort study at a New York City hospital at the peak of the early pandemic in the United States, under crisis conditions. The aim was to determine the benefit of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19. The primary out… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high mortality rate even among the responders in this study might be explained by the higher severity of patients and the use of iEPO as the last resort. Likewise, Garcia et al ( 16 ) reported the survival rate of 14.3% in their cohort with veno-venous-ECMO for COVID-19 patients that underwent PP, whereas Shelhamer et al ( 17 ) reported mortality of 77.4% in the PP group and 83.9% in the control group that did not undergo PP. The authors explained that the high mortality was contributed by the severe acuity of patients receiving those treatments (PP or ECMO) as rescue therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high mortality rate even among the responders in this study might be explained by the higher severity of patients and the use of iEPO as the last resort. Likewise, Garcia et al ( 16 ) reported the survival rate of 14.3% in their cohort with veno-venous-ECMO for COVID-19 patients that underwent PP, whereas Shelhamer et al ( 17 ) reported mortality of 77.4% in the PP group and 83.9% in the control group that did not undergo PP. The authors explained that the high mortality was contributed by the severe acuity of patients receiving those treatments (PP or ECMO) as rescue therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, prone positioning (PP) was shown to improve oxygenation and reduce 28- and 90-day mortality in intubated patients with severe ARDS ( 9 , 10 ). Thus, PP has been recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 subcommittee ( 11 ) and broadly used as an early intervention for intubated COVID-19 patients with refractory hypoxemia ( 8 , 12 17 ). In this preliminary study, we compared the effects of PP and iEPO both individually and in combination, on oxygenation in COVID-19 patients with refractory hypoxemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prone positioning presents the potential benefit of a relieve of severe hypoxemia due to reduction of overinflated lung areas, promoting alveolar recruitment and decreasing ventilation/perfusion mismatch. This intervention might be considered in patients with PO2/ FiO2 < 150, in the absence of contraindications [29,30]. The main objective of mechanical ventilation in these patients is to maintain a lung-protective strategy for all patients with ARDS, defined as targeting a tidal volume of 4 to 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and a plateau pressure of less than 30 cmH 2 O [28].…”
Section: Invasive Mechanical Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In emerging literature on patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to COVID-19, researchers report an association between PP and improved physiologic parameters and reduced mortality rate. 30 More research is needed to examine the long-term benefits of PP for patients with COVID-19.…”
Section: No Of Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%