No abstract

Successful bronchodilator therapy with a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients requires adequate delivery of aerosol to the lower respiratory tract. We determined the effect of ventilator mode, inspiratory flow pattern, humidity, and spontaneous respiratory effort on albuterol delivery in a model of the trachea and bronchi. The model was ventilated through an endotracheal tube during controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), assist control (AC), pressure support (PS), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), separately with a dry and humidified ventilator circuit. Delivery of albuterol administered by a MDI and spacer on filter placed at the ends of the bronchi was measured by spectrophotometry (246 nm). Under dry conditions and with a frequency of 10 breaths/min, albuterol delivery with CMV (VT, 800 ml; 30.3 +/- 3.4%), AC (VT, 800 ml; 31.9 +/- 1.3%), PS 10 cm H2O (VT, 700 ml; 28.8 +/- 4.5%), or PS 20 cm H2O (VT, 800 ml; 30.9 +/- 1.8%) was lower than that observed with simulated spontaneous breaths with CPAP (VT, 800 ml; 39.2 +/- 1.4%) (p < 0.01 for all modes). Delivery was greater under dry (28.8 to 39%) than under humidified conditions (15.9 to 20.2%) (p < 0.005 in all modes). Albuterol delivery showed a linear correlation with both inspiratory time and duty cycle (r > 0.91). Lower respiratory tract delivery of aerosol from a MDI varied from 4.9 to 39.2%. We conclude that in addition to other known factors such as dose, type of spacer, and its position the technique of administering MDIs in mechanically ventilated patients markedly influences lower respiratory tract aerosol delivery.

BAY41-6551 400 mg q12h warrants further clinical evaluation.

We attempted to resolve the discrepancies in reported data on aerosol deposition from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-propelled metered-dose inhaler (MDI) during mechanical ventilation, obtained by in vivo and in vitro methodologies. Albuterol delivery to the lower respiratory tract was decreased in a humidified versus a dry circuit (16.2 versus 30.4%, respectively; p < 0.01). In 10 mechanically ventilated patients, 4.8% of the nominal dose was exhaled. When the exhaled aerosol was subtracted from the in vitro delivery of 16.2% achieved in a humidified ventilator circuit, the resulting value (16.2 - 4.8 = 11.4%) was similar to in vivo estimates of aerosol deposition. Having reconciled in vitro with in vivo findings, we then evaluated factors influencing aerosol delivery. A lower inspiratory flow rate (40 versus 80 L/min; p < 0.001), a longer duty cycle (0.50 versus 0.25; p < 0.04), and a shorter interval between successive MDI actuations (15 versus 60 s; p < 0.02) increased aerosol delivery, whereas use of a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-propelled MDI decreased aerosol delivery compared with the CFC-propelled MDI. A MDI and actuator combination other than that designed by the manufacturer altered aerosol particle size and decreased drug delivery. In conclusion, aerosol delivery in an in vitro model accurately reflects in vivo delivery, providing a means for investigating methods to improve the efficiency of aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation.