1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02519614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prompt gamma-ray yields from proton bombardment of transition elements (Ti to Zn)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main contribution to the background is due to the Compton scattering within the detector of γ -rays produced in the primary target from nuclear reactions. At the proton energy used, the γ -rays having the higher thick target yield are due to the 52 Cr(p, γ ) 53 Mn nuclear reaction [29] with energies 378, 913 and 1290 keV respectively. This source of background together with the bremsstrahlung radiation produced in the targets due to the s1 and E m s2 correspond to the maximum RRS photon energies produced and are expressed as the differences between the energy of the exciting beam and of the Ce M-subshell binding energies U M IV,V and U M II,III respectively.…”
Section: Reduction Of Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution to the background is due to the Compton scattering within the detector of γ -rays produced in the primary target from nuclear reactions. At the proton energy used, the γ -rays having the higher thick target yield are due to the 52 Cr(p, γ ) 53 Mn nuclear reaction [29] with energies 378, 913 and 1290 keV respectively. This source of background together with the bremsstrahlung radiation produced in the targets due to the s1 and E m s2 correspond to the maximum RRS photon energies produced and are expressed as the differences between the energy of the exciting beam and of the Ce M-subshell binding energies U M IV,V and U M II,III respectively.…”
Section: Reduction Of Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the majority of the background observed at the 3 MeV case is due to the intense 65 Cu(p, n) 65 Zn reaction opening above 2.168 MeV. 35 Detailed tables for the γ -ray production versus incident proton energy from thick targets have been published 26,27 and can be taken into consideration for optimizing the energy of protons (although accounting the complexity of such estimation, the best way is to follow an experimental procedure, i.e., changing the proton energy and recording the signal to background ratio). As a practical recommendation it could be suggested that an optimum proton energy is the one that the background due to γ -rays accounts only for a small fraction (∼10%) among the typical background contributions that a low Z scattered x-ray beam generates, including the incomplete charge collection component.…”
Section: Estimating the Proton-induced X-ray Beam Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%