2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promotional effects of Ce, Mn and Fe oxides on CuO/SiO2 catalysts for CO oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results well consist of various reports 57. Xi et al54 observed a strong peak near 300 C in the TPR spectrum of Mn/SiO 2 catalyst, while other peaks occurred at 410 C which was weak. In the TPR spectrum of Mn/Al 2 O 3 catalyst, the reduction peaks are located at about 365 C and 460 C.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results well consist of various reports 57. Xi et al54 observed a strong peak near 300 C in the TPR spectrum of Mn/SiO 2 catalyst, while other peaks occurred at 410 C which was weak. In the TPR spectrum of Mn/Al 2 O 3 catalyst, the reduction peaks are located at about 365 C and 460 C.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…64 According to Figure 4, the peaks assigned to the strong interaction between active metals (Fe, Mn and Cu) with each other were not seen. However, Xi et al 54 pointed to a strong interaction between Fe 2 O 3 with CuO and Mn 2 O 3 with copper oxide which reveals the excellent dispersion of the copper oxide in the prepared catalyst. Also, no peaks related to the interaction between active metals with ZrO 2 support in the XRD spectrum were observed, which agreed well with TPR results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is necessary to note that SiO 2 is an inert support in addition to its high mechanical strength and thermal stability . Although the activity of Cu–SiO 2 catalysts in the CO oxidation reaction was generally unsatisfactory, it has been reported that the addition of CeO 2 could considerably enhance their catalytic activity. , Particularly, Águila et al found that compared to Al 2 O 3 , the inertness of SiO 2 facilitated the formation of the copper–ceria interface on its surface, which was the active phase in CO oxidation . Afterward, they found out that loading CuO after impregnating with a Ce precursor was more conducive to the formation of CuO species in contact with CeO 2 than the co-impregnation method .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%