2011
DOI: 10.5175/jswe.2011.200900035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting the Social Justice Orientation of Students: The Role of the Educator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…asp). However, recent studies examining the role of social justice in the profession argue that the profession of social work has not demonstrated commitment to this core value (Chu, Tsui, & Yan, 2009;Funge, 2011;Karger & Hernández, 2004;Reisch, 2002). A major implication of these observations suggests that one of the key issues of relevance in the African-American community, social justice, is a core value of the social work profession in theory, but not in practice.…”
Section: Dynamics Of the African-american Communitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…asp). However, recent studies examining the role of social justice in the profession argue that the profession of social work has not demonstrated commitment to this core value (Chu, Tsui, & Yan, 2009;Funge, 2011;Karger & Hernández, 2004;Reisch, 2002). A major implication of these observations suggests that one of the key issues of relevance in the African-American community, social justice, is a core value of the social work profession in theory, but not in practice.…”
Section: Dynamics Of the African-american Communitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Second, access to syllabi was limited so multicultural course content could not be examined. Third, being in a program with required multicultural content course only accounts for a small percentage of the variance; clearly there are other factors to consider, such as faculty knowledge, skills, and preparedness (Funge, 2011;SciameGiesecke, Roden, & Parkison, 2009;Singleton, 1994), program characteristics, and actual course content (Abrams & Gibson, 2007). A last consideration is that a pretest was not administered to study participants.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Doctoral education functions as a pipeline for generating the content knowledge and pedagogical approaches for the rest of social work education, as doctoral education is the profession's primary means for training future social work scholars and educators. Doctoral education has specifically been referenced as an essential mechanism for the profession achieving its ideals (Anastas and Congress, 1999;Funge, 2011;Hudson et al, 2014;Lubben and Harootyan, 2003). Doctoral education in social work and social welfare, however, is often described as being in a state of crisis (CSWE, 2012;Khinduka, 2002;Lindsey and Kirk, 1992;Orme, 2003;Valentine et al, 1998).…”
Section: Curricular Reform In Doctoral Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration may be more successful if improvements could be made to the pedagogical practice and preparation of all instructors. Facilitating the uptake and high-quality implementation of social justice content would likely require deliberate training of existing or upcoming social work educators (Funge, 2011;Gutiérrez, Fredricksen and Soifer, 1999;Garcia and Van Soest, 2000;Hackman, 2005;Hudson et al, 2014). Yet, even if existing and upcoming instructors were universally prepared to deliver social justice content, a number of barriers persist.…”
Section: Approaches To Curricular Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation