Promoting Handwriting Fluency for Preschool and Elementary-Age Students: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis of Research From 2000 to 2020

Abstract

Handwriting is a complex activity that involves continuous interaction between lower-level handwriting and motor skills and higher-order cognitive processes. It is important to allocate mental resources to these high-order processes since these processes place a great demand on cognitive capacity. This is possible when lower-level skills such as transcription are effortlessness and fluent. Given that fluency is a value in virtually all areas of academic learning, schools should provide instructional activities to promote writing fluency from the first stages of learning to write. In an effort to determine if teaching handwriting enhances writing fluency, we conducted a systematic and meta-analytic review of the writing fluency intervention literature. We selected 31 studies: 21 true and quasi-experimental studies, 4 single-group design, 3 single-subject design, and 3 non-experimental studies, conducted with K-6 students in a regular school setting. A total of 2,030 students participated in these studies. When compared to no instruction or non-handwriting instructional conditions, teaching different handwriting intervention programs resulted in statistically significant greater writing fluency (ES = 0.64). Moreover, three specific handwriting interventions yielded statistically significant results in improving writing fluency, when compared to other handwriting interventions or to typical handwriting instruction conditions: handwriting focused on training timed transcription skills (ES = 0.49), multicomponent handwriting treatments (ES = 0.40), and performance feedback (ES = 0.36). There were not enough data to calculate the impact of sensory-motor and self-regulated strategy handwriting interventions on writing fluency. The significance of these findings for implementing and differentiating handwriting fluency instruction and guiding future research will be discussed.

Effectiveness of Psychomotor Therapy among Children with Graphomotor Impairment with and without DCD-Diagnosis

“…The initial results of our therapy protocol analysis [ 82 ] demonstrated that the pencil-and-paper-based promotion of visuomotor skills (11%) and direct handwriting training (15.5%) took up a quarter of all training units. Therefore, our zero finding regarding handwriting skills is unexpected, especially given the fact that even short-term task-based interventions improve handwriting fluency among struggling and typically developing young handwriters [ 99 ]. These findings may have several explanations.…”

Using Interventions to Increase Test Access: An Alternative to Accommodations?

“…However, these interventions do not separate out how much improvement is due to handwriting fluency per se versus other aspects of the written composition process (e.g., idea generation), even if the efficacy of the intervention is measured using handwriting fluency. López-Escribano et al (2022) performed a meta-analysis and meta-synthesis examining the efficacy of different types of writing interventions, and their work allows for the separation of different components of efficacy. Importantly, they calculated just the effects of handwriting interventions on writing fluency, finding a medium-to-large effect size (0.66) for studies comparing a handwriting intervention condition with either (a) no intervention or (b) intervention that was not focused on handwriting.…”

Exploitation and exploration in text evolution. Quantifying planning and translation flows during writing

“…The act of revision often involves adapting the initial plan, and enacting these adaptations as new sentence generation or alteration events. Put differently, these phases “are not strictly sequential; rather [they] interact recursively…can interrupt each other, and are embedded in each other” (p.2) [ 3 ].…”