2019
DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2019.1589903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting charity accountability: understanding disclosure of serious incidents

Abstract: Charities are under increasing pressure to be accountable. Using a novel dataset, we provide the first analysis of the characteristics of charities voluntarily disclosing details of serious incidents that may threaten their organisation. Financial loss, fraud and theft, and personal behaviour account for a majority of serious incidents reported. Larger, older organisations that have previously been subject to a regulatory investigation are more likely to report serious incidents. However, it is smaller, younge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These four papers demonstrate how NGOs have developed additional forms of accountability in the form of actions to meet their specific purposes (Munro, 1996), which allows us to recognise the possibility and capacity of NGOs to design different procedures of how accounts should be produced and exchanged (Roberts, 1991(Roberts, , 2003 with the clients, users, or beneficiaries, members, communities, partners, staff and supporters (Christensen & Ebrahim, 2006;Dixon et al, 2006Edwards & Hulme, 1996. The other papers in this special issue (Cordery et al, 2019;Kemp & Morgan, 2019;McDonnell & Rutherford, 2019) also problematise the capacity of formal financial reporting to satisfy all the accounting and accountability requirements of NGOs. Therefore, NGOs were observed to complement formal, accounts by producing customised, voluntary accounts (Christensen & Ebrahim, 2006) that enabled the NGO to "account" for a more holistic understanding of their responsibilities that extends beyond economic and legal compliance (Munro, 1996).…”
Section: Ngos Social Purpose Accounting and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These four papers demonstrate how NGOs have developed additional forms of accountability in the form of actions to meet their specific purposes (Munro, 1996), which allows us to recognise the possibility and capacity of NGOs to design different procedures of how accounts should be produced and exchanged (Roberts, 1991(Roberts, , 2003 with the clients, users, or beneficiaries, members, communities, partners, staff and supporters (Christensen & Ebrahim, 2006;Dixon et al, 2006Edwards & Hulme, 1996. The other papers in this special issue (Cordery et al, 2019;Kemp & Morgan, 2019;McDonnell & Rutherford, 2019) also problematise the capacity of formal financial reporting to satisfy all the accounting and accountability requirements of NGOs. Therefore, NGOs were observed to complement formal, accounts by producing customised, voluntary accounts (Christensen & Ebrahim, 2006) that enabled the NGO to "account" for a more holistic understanding of their responsibilities that extends beyond economic and legal compliance (Munro, 1996).…”
Section: Ngos Social Purpose Accounting and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The interaction of the six definitional themes in the NGO ecosystem and the emergence of NGO-related scandals and frauds has a number of specific attributes that are also necessary to consider in academic research, and these are highlighted through the papers in this issue. First, the NGO sector is a significant and growing part of many nations' economies (Salamon et al, 2013), a matter which has led to the increase of regulation and reporting requirements (see Cordery et al, 2019;McDonnell & Rutherford, 2019). Secondly, NGOs within this ecosystem are diverse in terms of size however measured (O'Leary, 2017).…”
Section: Ngossome Definitional Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations