2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting and Tuning Porosity of Flexible Ether-Linked Phthalazinone-Based Covalent Triazine Frameworks Utilizing Substitution Effect for Effective CO2 Capture

Abstract: Five porous ether-linked phthalazinone-based covalent triazine frameworks (PHCTFs) were successfully constructed via ionothermal polymerizations from flexible dicyano monomers containing asymmetric, twisted, and N-heterocyclic phthalazinone structure. All the building blocks could be easily prepared by simple and low-cost aromatic nucleophilic substitution reactions, showing the large-scale application potential of thermal stable phthalazinone structure in constructing porous materials. Generally, the flexible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative analysis with the current literature data (according to samples analyzed under similar pressure and temperature conditions, see Table 2) reveals that CTF1 and CTF4 rank among the samples with the highest CO 2 uptake capacity reported up to now in the literature both at T = 273 and 298 K. With the exception of the CFT-py HT sample [30] (featured by a markedly higher specific surface area of 3040 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 9), the highly N/O co-doped HAT-CTF material [51] (1090 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 15) and the perfluorinated df -TzCTF600 [52] (1720 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 28), CTF4 outperforms the CO 2 adsorption capacity of many benchmark systems from this class of porous organic polymers. With 1.23 mmol·g −1 and 3.83 mmol·g −1 of adsorbed CO 2 at room temperature and 0.1 bar and 1 bar pressure, respectively (Table 2, entry 4), CTF4 surpasses the adsorption ability of samples such as bipy-CTFs (3.07–2.95 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 10, 11) [33], F-CTF (3.21–3.41 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 13, 14) [53], PHCTFs (1.57–1.34 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 17, 18) [54], bpim-CTFs (2.46–2.77 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 22, 23) [55] CTF-CSU41 (1.80 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 24) [56], PHCTF-8(650) (2.54 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 25) [57] and acac-CTF-5-500 (1.97 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 27) [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparative analysis with the current literature data (according to samples analyzed under similar pressure and temperature conditions, see Table 2) reveals that CTF1 and CTF4 rank among the samples with the highest CO 2 uptake capacity reported up to now in the literature both at T = 273 and 298 K. With the exception of the CFT-py HT sample [30] (featured by a markedly higher specific surface area of 3040 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 9), the highly N/O co-doped HAT-CTF material [51] (1090 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 15) and the perfluorinated df -TzCTF600 [52] (1720 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 28), CTF4 outperforms the CO 2 adsorption capacity of many benchmark systems from this class of porous organic polymers. With 1.23 mmol·g −1 and 3.83 mmol·g −1 of adsorbed CO 2 at room temperature and 0.1 bar and 1 bar pressure, respectively (Table 2, entry 4), CTF4 surpasses the adsorption ability of samples such as bipy-CTFs (3.07–2.95 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 10, 11) [33], F-CTF (3.21–3.41 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 13, 14) [53], PHCTFs (1.57–1.34 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 17, 18) [54], bpim-CTFs (2.46–2.77 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 22, 23) [55] CTF-CSU41 (1.80 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 24) [56], PHCTF-8(650) (2.54 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 25) [57] and acac-CTF-5-500 (1.97 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 27) [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Q st values and the CO 2 adsorption capacity on porous samples do not always coherently correlate [64]. Indeed, the literature presents several examples of materials featuring very high Q st values but only moderate CO 2 uptake [54,56]. The Q st value of CTF3 is relatively high because of its exceptionally high N content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of organic functionalization to tune porosity has been demonstrated across all advanced porous materials including MOFs, COFs, porous polymers, PCCs, and porous organic molecules [104–108] . Studies focused on tuning and optimizing permanent porosity for intrinsically porous molecular organic materials have recently garnered increased attention [42] .…”
Section: Gas Storage In Porous Organic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,39,44,45,47,48] Ag eneral trend shows that increasing porosity and especially the accessibility of (ultra-)micropore volumee nhance gas adsorption properties, while specific surface area alone does play am inor but not negligible role. Additionally, N-, O-, and S-heteroatoms, [48,49] fluorinated buildingu nits, [44,50] cationic viologen or imidazolium motifs [51,52] as well as metal dopants [53] have been reported to positively influence the adsorption and separation performance of the resultingC TFs. This knowledge is crucial for the tailoredd esign of active and selective catalysts applied in gas-phase reactions,a sw ill be highlighted later within this review.…”
Section: General Applications Of Ctfsmentioning
confidence: 99%