“…A comparative analysis with the current literature data (according to samples analyzed under similar pressure and temperature conditions, see Table 2) reveals that CTF1 and CTF4 rank among the samples with the highest CO 2 uptake capacity reported up to now in the literature both at T = 273 and 298 K. With the exception of the CFT-py HT sample [30] (featured by a markedly higher specific surface area of 3040 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 9), the highly N/O co-doped HAT-CTF material [51] (1090 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 15) and the perfluorinated df -TzCTF600 [52] (1720 m 2 ·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 28), CTF4 outperforms the CO 2 adsorption capacity of many benchmark systems from this class of porous organic polymers. With 1.23 mmol·g −1 and 3.83 mmol·g −1 of adsorbed CO 2 at room temperature and 0.1 bar and 1 bar pressure, respectively (Table 2, entry 4), CTF4 surpasses the adsorption ability of samples such as bipy-CTFs (3.07–2.95 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 10, 11) [33], F-CTF (3.21–3.41 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 13, 14) [53], PHCTFs (1.57–1.34 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 17, 18) [54], bpim-CTFs (2.46–2.77 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entries 22, 23) [55] CTF-CSU41 (1.80 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 24) [56], PHCTF-8(650) (2.54 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 25) [57] and acac-CTF-5-500 (1.97 mmol·g −1 ; Table 2, entry 27) [58].…”