2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonged stay in pediatric intensive care units: mortality and healthcare resource consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The rate of nosocomial infection (30%) in our longstay patients was lower as compared with other studies (75-96%). 6,15 The higher rate of nosocomial infection in other studies may be due to the inclusion of patients with suspected infection at time of admission to PICU, as the infections of nosocomial origin could not be established. 6 Our study found that presence of nosocomial infection was associated with mortality of PICU long-stay patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…14 The rate of nosocomial infection (30%) in our longstay patients was lower as compared with other studies (75-96%). 6,15 The higher rate of nosocomial infection in other studies may be due to the inclusion of patients with suspected infection at time of admission to PICU, as the infections of nosocomial origin could not be established. 6 Our study found that presence of nosocomial infection was associated with mortality of PICU long-stay patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6,15 The higher rate of nosocomial infection in other studies may be due to the inclusion of patients with suspected infection at time of admission to PICU, as the infections of nosocomial origin could not be established. 6 Our study found that presence of nosocomial infection was associated with mortality of PICU long-stay patients. The number of nosocomial infections acquired by the long-stay patients during their stay in the PICU was associated with mortality (p <0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patients may or may not have tracheostomies and be mechanically ventilated (White, 2012). Although experts disagree on the length of time that a chronic care device needs to be in place for the patient to be considered chronically critically ill, the range of cited length of mechanical ventilation is as little as 2 days to as long as 15 years, with an average time cited as 21 days (Boniatti et al, 2011, González-Cortés et al, 2011, King, 2012and Nelson et al, 2010. Researchers cite a range of 16 to 40 days after tracheostomy placement and intensive care length of stay anywhere from 7 to 51 days as the criteria to be considered chronically critically ill (Carson, 2012).…”
Section: How Is a Patient Classified As Chronically Critically Ill?mentioning
confidence: 99%