1994
DOI: 10.1006/taap.1994.1084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonged Behavioral Effects of in Utero Exposure to Lead or Methyl Mercury: Reduced Sensitivity to Changes in Reinforcement Contingencies during Behavioral Transitions and in Steady State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy, in light of this possibility, that in several cases behavior was reestablished by placing the rat under a less demanding DRH schedule and thereby increasing the reinforcement density, a sort of behavior therapy (for a related application, see Ref. [29]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy, in light of this possibility, that in several cases behavior was reestablished by placing the rat under a less demanding DRH schedule and thereby increasing the reinforcement density, a sort of behavior therapy (for a related application, see Ref. [29]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included among these effects are impaired sensory function in nonhuman primates (Rice, 1996;Gilbert, 1982, 1990), retarded behavior in transition in rodents and nonhuman primates (Newland et al, 2004;Newland et al, 1994;Paletz et al, 2006), deficits in complex, high-rate operant behavior (Newland and Rasmussen, 2000), disrupted performance on timing in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement (Rice, 1992), delayed object permanence (Burbacher et al, 1988;Gunderson et al, 1988b), and impaired facial recognition (Gunderson et al, 1988a). Performance on tasks that tap memory function, however, are relatively spared after developmental MeHg exposure (Elsner et al, 1988;Gilbert et al, 1993;Goldey et al, 1994;Newland and Paletz, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disruption of reinforcement processes in the form of impaired sensitivity to changes in reinforcement contingencies has significant implications. Sensitivity to consequences, and specifically to reinforcer frequency, is a critical process in adaptive behavior (Newland et al 1994;Staddon 1998). Individuals able to efficiently modify behavior patterns in accord with changes in environmental contingencies are conferred a decided advantage over potential competitors (Skinner 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%